NVDLvsBULZETF Comparison
VS
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Equity. NVDL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.06%, versus 0.95% for BULZ. NVDL is up 6.68% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.74B in YTD flows. BULZ performs better with 25.36% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NVDL and BULZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NVDL vs BULZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NVDL BULZ | -15.41%-31.32% | -5.55%-7.28% | +6.68%+25.36% | +8.78%+21.97% | +659.84%+426.95% | n/a+20.51% |
| Flows | NVDL BULZ | +$4M- | -$439M- | -$1.74B- | -$1.53B- | -$1.17B- | -+$3.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NVDL BULZ | +74.89%+89.07% | +75.00%+89.84% | +92.45%+85.80% | n/a+94.25% |
| Max drawdown | NVDL BULZ | -22.16%-31.32% | -42.21%-55.29% | -67.57%-68.03% | n/a-94.45% |
| Max drawdown duration | NVDL BULZ | 16d30d | 194d143d | 401d174d | n/a1621d |
Trading data
NVDL | BULZ | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.91 | $32.38 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $31.32 | $32.56 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 25, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NVDL | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NVDL | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.91 | $32.38 |
| 1D performance | -1.31% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $3.20 B | $2.76 B |
| E/R | 1.06% | 0.95% |
Characteristics
NVDL | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | GraniteShares | BMO |
| Benchmark | NVIDIA | Solactive FANG Innovation Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2022 | August 17, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NVDL
Data will be available soon
BULZ
Data will be available soon
Sectors
NVDL
Data will be available soon
BULZ
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
NVDL
Data will be available soon
BULZ
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
NVDL
Data will be available soon
BULZ
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about NVDL and BULZ
How have the NVDL and BULZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, NVDL is up 6.68% year-to-date (YTD), while BULZ has returned 25.36%. That puts BULZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NVDL or BULZ?
Year-to-date, the NVDL ETF saw -$1.74B in flows, compared to - for BULZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: NVDL or BULZ?
Over the past year, NVDL had a volatility of 75%, while BULZ experienced 89.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: NVDL or BULZ?
As of October 22, 2026, NVDL holds $3.20 B in assets under management (AUM), while BULZ manages $2.76 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about NVDL & BULZ
Chinese Artificial Intelligence (AI) DeepSeek: ETF Winners & Losers
January 27, 2025
NVDL
Advertisement
Advertisement
