Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NUMVvsONEVETF Comparison
NuShares ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. NUMV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, ONEV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. NUMV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.2% for ONEV. NUMV is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. ONEV performs better with 1.63% YTD performance, and -$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NUMV and ONEV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NUMV vs ONEV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NUMV ONEV | -4.41%-3.74% | -1.49%+0.61% | -1.14%+1.63% | +16.69%+11.04% | +48.08%+41.21% | +33.24%+50.35% |
| Flows | NUMV ONEV | -$12M-$1M | -$160K-$53M | -$12M-$29M | +$9M-$86M | -$26M-$196M | +$176M-$162M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NUMV ONEV | +13.21%+10.79% | +17.19%+14.94% | +15.21%+12.94% | +17.52%+14.76% |
| Max drawdown | NUMV ONEV | -6.95%-5.46% | -12.51%-10.87% | -19.49%-14.90% | -25.58%-18.48% |
| Max drawdown duration | NUMV ONEV | 11d10d | 37d42d | 254d254d | 923d566d |
NUMV | ONEV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.56 | $135.13 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.63 | $135.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NUMV | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NUMV | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.56 | $135.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $405.83 M | $535.81 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.2% |
NUMV | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Nuveen | SPDR |
| Benchmark | MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index | Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 89 | 415 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2016 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NUMV and ONEV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, NUMV is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEV has returned 1.63%. That puts ONEV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NUMV or ONEV?
Year-to-date, the NUMV ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to -$29M for ONEV.
Which ETF is more volatile: NUMV or ONEV?
Over the past year, NUMV had a volatility of 17.19%, while ONEV experienced 14.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: NUMV or ONEV?
As of March 12, 2026, NUMV holds $405.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEV manages $535.81 M.
What sectors do the NUMV and ONEV ETFs invest in?
NUMV leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ONEV focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NUMV ETF and ONEV ETF?
NUMV top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, BAKER HUGHES and ECHOSTAR. ONEV holds in its top three: CARDINAL HEALTH, AMERISOURCEBERGEN and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTN.
Which ETF is more diversified: NUMV or ONEV?
NUMV holds 94 securities with 31.14% of its assets in the top 15. ONEV has 439 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.17%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
