Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NUMVvsCZAETF Comparison
NuShares ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. NUMV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CZA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. NUMV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.31%, versus 0.69% for CZA. NUMV is up 1.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. CZA performs better with 1.81% YTD performance, and -$42M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NUMV and CZA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NUMV vs CZA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NUMV CZA | -3.94%-3.57% | +1.19%+1.78% | +1.02%+1.81% | +16.89%+10.31% | +48.12%+36.28% | +37.95%+48.16% |
| Flows | NUMV CZA | -$12M- | +$2M-$3M | -$12M-$42M | +$9M-$18M | -$26M-$67M | +$180M-$98M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NUMV CZA | +12.84%+12.30% | +17.16%+17.64% | +15.23%+14.82% | +17.51%+16.05% |
| Max drawdown | NUMV CZA | -4.91%-4.74% | -12.51%-13.23% | -19.49%-18.73% | -25.58%-18.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | NUMV CZA | 9d12d | 37d37d | 254d373d | 923d373d |
NUMV | CZA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.34 | $112.41 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $39.48 | $112.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NUMV | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NUMV | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.34 | $112.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $414.70 M | $183.76 M |
| E/R | 0.31% | 0.69% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NUMV and CZA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, NUMV is up 1.02% year-to-date (YTD), while CZA has returned 1.81%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NUMV or CZA?
Year-to-date, the NUMV ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to -$42M for CZA.
Which ETF is more volatile: NUMV or CZA?
Over the past year, NUMV had a volatility of 17.16%, while CZA experienced 17.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: NUMV or CZA?
As of March 10, 2026, NUMV holds $414.70 M in assets under management (AUM), while CZA manages $183.76 M.
What sectors do the NUMV and CZA ETFs invest in?
NUMV leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CZA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the NUMV ETF and CZA ETF?
NUMV top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, BAKER HUGHES and ECHOSTAR. CZA holds in its top three: IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC.
Which ETF is more diversified: NUMV or CZA?
NUMV holds 94 securities with 31.14% of its assets in the top 15. CZA has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.8%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
