Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NULGvsTGRTETF Comparison
NuShares ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. NULG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, TGRT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NULG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.38% for TGRT. NULG is down -5.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$550M in YTD flows. TGRT performs worse with -8.71% YTD performance, and +$188M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NULG and TGRT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NULG vs TGRT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NULG TGRT | -3.41%-2.13% | -3.98%-7.46% | -5.21%-8.71% | +19.55%+18.13% | +82.16%n/a | +70.68%n/a |
| Flows | NULG TGRT | +$220M+$29M | +$574M+$175M | +$550M+$188M | +$809M+$514M | +$798M- | +$1.20B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NULG TGRT | +18.25%+16.50% | +22.18%+22.30% | +18.83%n/a | +21.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NULG TGRT | -7.47%-9.97% | -14.60%-15.41% | -22.48%n/a | -36.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NULG TGRT | 65d75d | 37d45d | 187dn/a | 801dn/a |
NULG | TGRT | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $93.94 | $40.94 |
| Previous close 03/16/2026 | $92.69 | $40.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NULG | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NULG | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $93.94 | $40.94 |
| 1D performance | +1.35% | +1.43% |
| AuM | $2.37 B | $1.00 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.38% |
NULG | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Nuveen | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 69 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2016 | June 15, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NULG and TGRT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NULG is down -5.21% year-to-date (YTD), while TGRT has lost -8.71%. That puts NULG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NULG or TGRT?
Year-to-date, the NULG ETF saw +$550M in flows, compared to +$188M for TGRT.
Which ETF is more volatile: NULG or TGRT?
Over the past year, NULG had a volatility of 22.18%, while TGRT experienced 22.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: NULG or TGRT?
As of March 13, 2026, NULG holds $2.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while TGRT manages $1.00 B.
What sectors do the NULG and TGRT ETFs invest in?
NULG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, TGRT focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NULG ETF and TGRT ETF?
NULG top holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and LILLY. TGRT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: NULG or TGRT?
NULG holds 65 securities with 53.02% of its assets in the top 15. TGRT has 74 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.83%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
