Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NUKZvsRCTRETF Comparison
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) and First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Utilities and Energy. NUKZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.7% for RCTR. NUKZ is up 9.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. RCTR performs better with 11.93% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NUKZ and RCTR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NUKZ vs RCTR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NUKZ RCTR | -1.85%-0.27% | +3.59%+10.73% | +9.54%+11.93% | +78.08%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NUKZ RCTR | +$15M- | +$35M+$5M | +$35M+$5M | +$430M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NUKZ RCTR | +25.72%+24.83% | +28.34%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NUKZ RCTR | -7.59%-7.92% | -18.76%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NUKZ RCTR | 9d22d | 42dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
NUKZ | RCTR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.56 | $35.62 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $68.84 | $36.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NUKZ | RCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NUKZ | RCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.56 | $35.62 |
| 1D performance | -1.86% | -1.37% |
| AuM | $829.04 M | $21.77 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.7% |
NUKZ | RCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Range Nuclear Renaissance Index | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 42 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 23, 2024 | July 30, 2025 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NUKZ and RCTR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NUKZ is up 9.54% year-to-date (YTD), while RCTR has returned 11.93%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NUKZ or RCTR?
Year-to-date, the NUKZ ETF saw +$35M in flows, compared to +$5M for RCTR.
Which ETF is bigger: NUKZ or RCTR?
As of March 11, 2026, NUKZ holds $829.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while RCTR manages $21.77 M.
What sectors do the NUKZ and RCTR ETFs invest in?
NUKZ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, RCTR focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the NUKZ ETF and RCTR ETF?
NUKZ top holdings include CAMECO, CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP and LOCKHEED MARTIN. RCTR holds in its top three: CAMECO, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and MITSUBISHI HVY.
Which ETF is more diversified: NUKZ or RCTR?
NUKZ holds 39 securities with 54.97% of its assets in the top 15. RCTR has 43 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.25%.
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
