Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NSCRvsLGHETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF
Nuveen Sustainable Core Equity ETF (NSCR) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) is part of the segment. NSCR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, LGH's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NSCR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 1% for LGH. NSCR is down -3.86% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. LGH performs better with -2.31% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NSCR and LGH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NSCR vs LGH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NSCR LGH | -3.92%-3.15% | -4.16%-3.24% | -3.86%-2.31% | +16.38%+24.68% | n/a+84.98% | n/a+79.44% |
| Flows | NSCR LGH | -- | --$3M | --$3M | +$294K+$26M | -+$110M | -+$244M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NSCR LGH | +12.99%+16.11% | +18.97%+17.89% | n/a+16.87% | n/a+16.76% |
| Max drawdown | NSCR LGH | -6.66%-5.38% | -14.33%-11.27% | n/a-18.42% | n/a-29.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | NSCR LGH | 57d57d | 48d48d | n/a206d | n/a806d |
NSCR | LGH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.32 | $59.21 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $29.82 | $60.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NSCR | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NSCR | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.32 | $59.21 |
| 1D performance | -1.67% | -2.04% |
| AuM | $6.58 M | $563.21 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 1% |
NSCR | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Nuveen | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | - | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 393 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 5, 2024 | October 7, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NSCR and LGH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, NSCR is down -3.86% year-to-date (YTD), while LGH has lost -2.31%. That puts LGH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NSCR or LGH?
Year-to-date, the NSCR ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$3M for LGH.
Which ETF is more volatile: NSCR or LGH?
Over the past year, NSCR had a volatility of 18.97%, while LGH experienced 17.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: NSCR or LGH?
As of March 10, 2026, NSCR holds $6.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while LGH manages $563.21 M.
What sectors do the NSCR and LGH ETFs invest in?
NSCR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, LGH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NSCR ETF and LGH ETF?
NSCR top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, APPLE and NVIDIA. LGH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NSCR or LGH?
NSCR holds 53 securities with 54.55% of its assets in the top 15. LGH has 405 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.6%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
