NOEQvsLCDSETF Comparison
Northern Trust US Equity ETF (NOEQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) is part of the US Large Cap segment. NOEQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, LCDS's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. NOEQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.3% for LCDS. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOEQ and LCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NOEQ vs LCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOEQ LCDS | +0.84%+1.58% | +5.55%+5.08% | n/a+9.51% | n/a+18.57% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NOEQ LCDS | -$201K-$2M | +$2K+$34K | -+$34K | --$4K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOEQ LCDS | +11.88%+12.18% | n/a+12.33% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NOEQ LCDS | -3.76%-4.20% | n/a-8.97% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NOEQ LCDS | 36d42d | n/a76d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
NOEQ | LCDS | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.38 | $71.27 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $28.39 | $71.26 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NOEQ | LCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.38 | $71.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $860.71 M | $16.03 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.3% |
NOEQ | LCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Northern Trust | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 3017 | 112 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2026 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
