NHYMvsVCRMETF Comparison
VS
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. NHYM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.12% for VCRM. NHYM is down -1.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. VCRM performs better with -0.18% YTD performance, and +$2.01B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NHYM and VCRM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NHYM vs VCRM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NHYM VCRM | -0.47%+1.56% | -3.68%-0.95% | -1.23%-0.18% | -1.18%+0.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NHYM VCRM | +$10M+$785M | +$13M+$1.04B | +$61M+$2.01B | +$62M+$2.19B | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NHYM VCRM | +7.50%+5.42% | +4.44%+3.45% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NHYM VCRM | -7.48%-5.58% | -8.21%-6.33% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NHYM VCRM | 70d71d | 109d109d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
NHYM | VCRM | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.66 | $73.36 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $23.70 | $73.15 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NHYM | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.66 | $73.36 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.29% |
| AuM | $143.31 M | $2.78 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.12% |
Exposure
Countries
NHYM
USA
52.74%
Other
47.26%
VCRM
USA
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Sectors
NHYM
Municipal
52.74%
Other
47.26%
VCRM
Municipal
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
NHYM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.13%
VCRM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NHYM
New York Liberty Development Corp., 5% 15nov2044, USD
1.87%
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, 5.25% 1dec2056, USD (2016A)
1.50%
North Carolina Department of Transportation, 5% 30jun2054, USD (2015)
1.42%
Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust, 6.25% 1dec2035, USD (2025)
1.25%
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, 5% 15jun2050, USD (2020A)
1.24%
Chicago O'Hare International Airport, 5% 1jan2060, USD (2025E)
1.11%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1jul2046, USD (2016A)
1.11%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5.125% 30jun2060, USD (2023)
1.10%
Washington Convention Center Public Facilities District, 5% 1jul2058, USD
1.07%
US09182TGL52
0.98%
Chandler Industrial Development Authority, 4% 1jun2049, USD (2019)
0.94%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 5% 1jun2055, USD (2020B-2)
0.92%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5% 1jul2058, USD
0.91%
US92766AAN81
0.91%
US018444CH05
0.81%
VCRM
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
0.71%
US09182TEC71
0.61%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022)
0.53%
Jefferson Sales Tax District, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2017B)
0.52%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2042, USD (2021-A)
0.48%
State of Hawaii, 4% 1may2036, USD
0.47%
US625517PJ02
0.46%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.45%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1apr2035, USD (2026A)
0.44%
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 6% 1jan2057, USD (2026B)
0.44%
Energy Southeast, 5% 1sep2033, USD (2025B)
0.42%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 1jul2062, USD (2023-1, A)
0.41%
US235330AW70
0.40%
US57563WAC29
0.40%
Indiana Finance Authority, 5% 1oct2046, USD (2016A)
0.38%
Frequently asked questions about NHYM and VCRM
How have the NHYM and VCRM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, NHYM is down -1.23% year-to-date (YTD), while VCRM has lost -0.18%. That puts VCRM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NHYM or VCRM?
Year-to-date, the NHYM ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to +$2.01B for VCRM.
Which ETF is more volatile: NHYM or VCRM?
Over the past year, NHYM had a volatility of 4.44%, while VCRM experienced 3.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: NHYM or VCRM?
As of October 22, 2026, NHYM holds $143.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while VCRM manages $2.78 B.
What sectors do the NHYM and VCRM ETFs invest in?
NHYM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VCRM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the NHYM ETF and VCRM ETF?
NHYM top holdings include New York Liberty Development Corp., 5% 15nov2044, USD, California Statewide Communities Development Authority, 5.25% 1dec2056, USD (2016A) and North Carolina Department of Transportation, 5% 30jun2054, USD (2015). VCRM holds in its top three: Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025), US09182TEC71 and Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022).
Which ETF is more diversified: NHYM or VCRM?
NHYM holds 264 securities with 17.13% of its assets in the top 15. VCRM has 2385 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.11%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NHYM & VCRM
Advertisement
