NBGXvsMFSGETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) and MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Finance. NBGX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.83%, versus 0.49% for MFSG. NBGX is up 3.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$683K in YTD flows. MFSG performs worse with 2.26% YTD performance, and +$171M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBGX and MFSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBGX vs MFSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBGX MFSG | -1.68%-4.45% | +0.75%-0.75% | +3.11%+2.26% | +7.37%+5.63% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NBGX MFSG | -+$16M | -+$68M | +$683K+$171M | +$1M+$207M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBGX MFSG | +16.19%+19.86% | +15.34%+18.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NBGX MFSG | -6.80%-8.31% | -14.92%-16.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NBGX MFSG | 60d59d | 184d177d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
NBGX | MFSG | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:46 PM | $28.91 | $29.28 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $28.91 | $28.94 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NBGX | MFSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.91 | $29.28 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +1.17% |
| AuM | $14.43 M | $355.59 M |
| E/R | 2.83% | 0.49% |
NBGX | MFSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | MFS |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 64 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15