Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NBGXvsIUSGETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NBGX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.83%, versus 0.04% for IUSG. NBGX is down -4.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$683K in YTD flows. IUSG performs better with -2.26% YTD performance, and +$1.51B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBGX and IUSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBGX vs IUSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBGX IUSG | -1.40%-1.65% | -4.97%-3.21% | -4.22%-2.26% | +20.29%+29.49% | n/a+103.20% | n/a+93.62% |
| Flows | NBGX IUSG | -+$435M | +$1M+$1.60B | +$683K+$1.51B | +$2M+$2.47B | -+$3.61B | -+$5.68B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBGX IUSG | +13.71%+16.23% | +20.61%+22.15% | n/a+18.43% | n/a+20.92% |
| Max drawdown | NBGX IUSG | -6.49%-5.83% | -14.35%-15.08% | n/a-22.25% | n/a-32.26% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBGX IUSG | 56d41d | 37d45d | n/a151d | n/a793d |
NBGX | IUSG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.73 | $164.20 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $26.78 | $164.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NBGX | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NBGX | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.73 | $164.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $13.41 M | $27.21 B |
| E/R | 2.83% | 0.04% |
NBGX | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 900 Growth |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 359 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | July 24, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NBGX and IUSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, NBGX is down -4.22% year-to-date (YTD), while IUSG has lost -2.26%. That puts IUSG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBGX or IUSG?
Year-to-date, the NBGX ETF saw +$683K in flows, compared to +$1.51B for IUSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBGX or IUSG?
Over the past year, NBGX had a volatility of 20.61%, while IUSG experienced 22.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBGX or IUSG?
As of March 9, 2026, NBGX holds $13.41 M in assets under management (AUM), while IUSG manages $27.21 B.
What sectors do the NBGX and IUSG ETFs invest in?
NBGX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IUSG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NBGX ETF and IUSG ETF?
NBGX top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. IUSG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBGX or IUSG?
NBGX holds 45 securities with 69.76% of its assets in the top 15. IUSG has 377 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.69%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
