Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NBGXvsILCGETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NBGX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.83%, versus 0.04% for ILCG. NBGX is down -4.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$683K in YTD flows. ILCG performs worse with -5.57% YTD performance, and -$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBGX and ILCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBGX vs ILCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBGX ILCG | -0.93%-2.21% | -5.56%-4.34% | -4.50%-5.57% | +19.82%+22.11% | n/a+95.61% | n/a+73.38% |
| Flows | NBGX ILCG | --$51M | +$1M-$51M | +$683K-$45M | +$2M+$36M | --$88M | --$213M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBGX ILCG | +13.69%+17.19% | +20.57%+22.79% | n/a+19.23% | n/a+22.01% |
| Max drawdown | NBGX ILCG | -6.49%-7.29% | -14.35%-15.63% | n/a-23.24% | n/a-35.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBGX ILCG | 58d44d | 37d45d | n/a151d | n/a807d |
NBGX | ILCG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.06 | $98.19 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.29 | $99.25 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NBGX | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NBGX | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.06 | $98.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.91% | -1.07% |
| AuM | $13.37 M | $2.73 B |
| E/R | 2.83% | 0.04% |
NBGX | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 302 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NBGX and ILCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NBGX is down -4.5% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCG has lost -5.57%. That puts NBGX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBGX or ILCG?
Year-to-date, the NBGX ETF saw +$683K in flows, compared to -$45M for ILCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBGX or ILCG?
Over the past year, NBGX had a volatility of 20.57%, while ILCG experienced 22.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBGX or ILCG?
As of March 11, 2026, NBGX holds $13.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while ILCG manages $2.73 B.
What sectors do the NBGX and ILCG ETFs invest in?
NBGX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ILCG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NBGX ETF and ILCG ETF?
NBGX top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. ILCG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBGX or ILCG?
NBGX holds 45 securities with 69.76% of its assets in the top 15. ILCG has 330 securities and a top 15 weight of 62%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
