NBFRvsEDGQETF Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NBFR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.53% for EDGQ. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBFR and EDGQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBFR vs EDGQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBFR EDGQ | +3.96%+4.03% | +9.96%+19.97% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NBFR EDGQ | -$5M+$2M | +$3M+$5M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBFR EDGQ | +15.85%+20.77% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NBFR EDGQ | -6.06%-6.44% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NBFR EDGQ | 16d16d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
NBFR | EDGQ | |
Last sale | ||
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | ||
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NBFR | EDGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | – |
| 1D performance | – | – |
| AuM | $14.88 M | $6.32 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.53% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
