Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NANRvsMGNRETF Comparison
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. NANR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MGNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Industrials. NANR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.75% for MGNR. NANR is up 19.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$136M in YTD flows. MGNR performs worse with 16.92% YTD performance, and +$243M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NANR and MGNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NANR vs MGNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NANR MGNR | -0.37%-2.87% | +20.95%+15.83% | +19.99%+16.92% | +56.87%+81.56% | +69.99%n/a | +126.16%n/a |
| Flows | NANR MGNR | -$126M+$90M | -$136M+$257M | -$136M+$243M | -$136M+$400M | -$288M- | -$127M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NANR MGNR | +23.32%+26.33% | +22.54%+25.69% | +19.61%n/a | +22.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NANR MGNR | -5.48%-7.72% | -16.16%-18.65% | -18.22%n/a | -26.26%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NANR MGNR | 11d10d | 65d54d | 200dn/a | 759dn/a |
NANR | MGNR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.42 | $50.04 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $82.73 | $51.43 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NANR | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NANR | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.42 | $50.04 |
| 1D performance | -1.58% | -2.69% |
| AuM | $779.56 M | $672.19 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.75% |
NANR | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SPDR | American Beacon |
| Benchmark | S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 42 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 15, 2015 | February 6, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NANR and MGNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NANR is up 19.99% year-to-date (YTD), while MGNR has returned 16.92%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NANR or MGNR?
Year-to-date, the NANR ETF saw -$136M in flows, compared to +$243M for MGNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: NANR or MGNR?
Over the past year, NANR had a volatility of 22.54%, while MGNR experienced 25.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: NANR or MGNR?
As of March 13, 2026, NANR holds $779.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while MGNR manages $672.19 M.
What sectors do the NANR and MGNR ETFs invest in?
NANR leans toward sectors like Energy and Materials. Meanwhile, MGNR focuses on Materials, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NANR ETF and MGNR ETF?
NANR top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and NEWMONT CORP. MGNR holds in its top three: HUDBAY MINERALS, TECK RESOURCES LIMITED and EQUINOX GOLD.
Which ETF is more diversified: NANR or MGNR?
NANR holds 182 securities with 48.68% of its assets in the top 15. MGNR has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.87%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
