Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NANRvsGUNRETF Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund ETF
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund ETF (GUNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. NANR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, GUNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. NANR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.47% for GUNR. NANR is up 21.96% year-to-date (YTD) with -$132M in YTD flows. GUNR performs worse with 19.92% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NANR and GUNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NANR vs GUNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NANR GUNR | +2.98%+4.00% | +22.39%+21.47% | +21.96%+19.92% | +59.86%+49.53% | +72.79%+45.91% | +129.77%+74.76% |
| Flows | NANR GUNR | -$122M+$93M | -$132M+$492M | -$132M+$492M | -$132M+$429M | -$284M-$1.43B | -$123M+$618M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NANR GUNR | +23.03%+17.77% | +22.47%+15.38% | +19.60%+14.64% | +22.60%+16.90% |
| Max drawdown | NANR GUNR | -5.12%-3.97% | -16.16%-12.82% | -18.22%-18.53% | -26.26%-23.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | NANR GUNR | 10d10d | 65d65d | 200d427d | 759d1239d |
NANR | GUNR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.42 | $54.13 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $82.73 | $55.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NANR | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NANR | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.42 | $54.13 |
| 1D performance | -1.58% | -1.62% |
| AuM | $796.52 M | $7.41 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.47% |
NANR | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index | Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 117 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 15, 2015 | September 16, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NANR and GUNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, NANR is up 21.96% year-to-date (YTD), while GUNR has returned 19.92%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NANR or GUNR?
Year-to-date, the NANR ETF saw -$132M in flows, compared to +$492M for GUNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: NANR or GUNR?
Over the past year, NANR had a volatility of 22.47%, while GUNR experienced 15.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: NANR or GUNR?
As of March 12, 2026, NANR holds $796.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while GUNR manages $7.41 B.
What sectors do the NANR and GUNR ETFs invest in?
NANR leans toward sectors like Energy and Materials. Meanwhile, GUNR focuses on Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the NANR ETF and GUNR ETF?
NANR top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and NEWMONT CORP. GUNR holds in its top three: EXXON, CORTEVA INC and CHEVRON TEXACO.
Which ETF is more diversified: NANR or GUNR?
NANR holds 182 securities with 48.68% of its assets in the top 15. GUNR has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
