Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NANCvsUSSGETF Comparison
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF -USD
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF -USD (NANC) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF (USSG) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. NANC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.09% for USSG. NANC is down -4.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2K in YTD flows. USSG performs better with -3.93% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NANC and USSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NANC vs USSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NANC USSG | -2.54%-3.77% | -4.34%-3.39% | -4.86%-3.93% | +22.00%+23.48% | +87.44%+81.28% | n/a+79.85% |
| Flows | NANC USSG | --$6M | -$2K+$37M | -$2K-$6M | -$4M-$96M | +$200M-$3.21B | --$3.49B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NANC USSG | +13.28%+12.72% | +19.33%+18.31% | +16.78%+15.52% | n/a+17.34% |
| Max drawdown | NANC USSG | -6.91%-6.57% | -13.93%-13.43% | -21.04%-20.08% | n/a-26.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | NANC USSG | 44d44d | 43d45d | 124d154d | n/a713d |
NANC | USSG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.37 | $61.01 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $43.55 | $61.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NANC | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NANC | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.37 | $61.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $250.64 M | $520.27 M |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.09% |
NANC | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Subversive Capital | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Selection Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 380 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 7, 2023 | March 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NANC and USSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NANC is down -4.86% year-to-date (YTD), while USSG has lost -3.93%. That puts USSG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NANC or USSG?
Year-to-date, the NANC ETF saw -$2K in flows, compared to -$6M for USSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: NANC or USSG?
Over the past year, NANC had a volatility of 19.33%, while USSG experienced 18.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: NANC or USSG?
As of March 13, 2026, NANC holds $250.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while USSG manages $520.27 M.
What sectors do the NANC and USSG ETFs invest in?
NANC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, USSG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the NANC ETF and USSG ETF?
NANC top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. USSG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: NANC or USSG?
NANC holds 103 securities with 60.14% of its assets in the top 15. USSG has 399 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
