Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NACPvsLCDSETF Comparison
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. NACP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, LCDS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. NACP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.3% for LCDS. NACP is up 0.89% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. LCDS performs worse with -0.76% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NACP and LCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NACP vs LCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NACP LCDS | -2.59%-2.71% | +0.42%-1.15% | +0.89%-0.76% | +27.64%+22.84% | +93.73%n/a | +87.60%n/a |
| Flows | NACP LCDS | -- | +$4M- | -- | -$5M-$38K | -$4M- | +$15M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NACP LCDS | +13.37%+11.53% | +19.18%+17.83% | +15.32%n/a | +17.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NACP LCDS | -5.03%-3.77% | -14.44%-13.48% | -19.85%n/a | -27.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NACP LCDS | 41d42d | 45d46d | 132dn/a | 718dn/a |
NACP | LCDS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.21 | $63.89 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $50.12 | $64.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NACP | LCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NACP | LCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.21 | $63.89 |
| 1D performance | -1.82% | -1.44% |
| AuM | $62.68 M | $14.59 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.3% |
NACP | LCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Impact Shares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 197 | 102 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 18, 2018 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NACP and LCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NACP is up 0.89% year-to-date (YTD), while LCDS has lost -0.76%. That puts NACP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NACP or LCDS?
Year-to-date, the NACP ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for LCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: NACP or LCDS?
Over the past year, NACP had a volatility of 19.18%, while LCDS experienced 17.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: NACP or LCDS?
As of March 11, 2026, NACP holds $62.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while LCDS manages $14.59 M.
What sectors do the NACP and LCDS ETFs invest in?
NACP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, LCDS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the NACP ETF and LCDS ETF?
NACP top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. LCDS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: NACP or LCDS?
NACP holds 201 securities with 45.66% of its assets in the top 15. LCDS has 108 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.49%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
