Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NACPvsFDLOETF Comparison
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. NACP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, FDLO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. NACP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.15% for FDLO. NACP is up 0.89% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FDLO performs worse with 0.11% YTD performance, and -$50M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NACP and FDLO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NACP vs FDLO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NACP FDLO | -2.59%-2.16% | +0.42%-0.58% | +0.89%+0.11% | +27.64%+12.62% | +93.73%+55.19% | +87.60%+66.13% |
| Flows | NACP FDLO | --$13M | +$4M-$67M | --$50M | -$5M-$49M | -$4M+$605M | +$15M+$630M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NACP FDLO | +13.37%+7.90% | +19.18%+13.86% | +15.32%+11.22% | +17.75%+13.35% |
| Max drawdown | NACP FDLO | -5.03%-2.53% | -14.44%-10.59% | -19.85%-13.57% | -27.56%-19.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | NACP FDLO | 41d37d | 45d48d | 132d131d | 718d688d |
NACP | FDLO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.21 | $66.17 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $50.12 | $66.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NACP | FDLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NACP | FDLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.21 | $66.17 |
| 1D performance | -1.82% | -1.08% |
| AuM | $62.68 M | $1.43 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.15% |
NACP | FDLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Impact Shares | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index | Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 197 | 122 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 18, 2018 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NACP and FDLO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NACP is up 0.89% year-to-date (YTD), while FDLO has returned 0.11%. That puts NACP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NACP or FDLO?
Year-to-date, the NACP ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$50M for FDLO.
Which ETF is more volatile: NACP or FDLO?
Over the past year, NACP had a volatility of 19.18%, while FDLO experienced 13.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: NACP or FDLO?
As of March 11, 2026, NACP holds $62.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDLO manages $1.43 B.
What sectors do the NACP and FDLO ETFs invest in?
NACP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, FDLO focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the NACP ETF and FDLO ETF?
NACP top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. FDLO holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: NACP or FDLO?
NACP holds 201 securities with 45.66% of its assets in the top 15. FDLO has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.79%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.