MVALvsSMOTETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MVAL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, SMOT's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MVAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.09%, versus 0.49% for SMOT. MVAL is up 8.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. SMOT performs better with 10.45% YTD performance, and -$69M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MVAL and SMOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MVAL vs SMOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MVAL SMOT | +5.34%+4.46% | +6.33%+3.11% | +8.28%+10.45% | +11.83%+10.59% | n/a+54.08% | n/an/a |
| Flows | MVAL SMOT | --$3M | +$1K-$15M | -$3M-$69M | -$3M-$78M | -+$42M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MVAL SMOT | +14.78%+14.22% | +14.12%+14.03% | n/a+17.37% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MVAL SMOT | -9.78%-9.37% | -12.10%-9.37% | n/a-23.35% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MVAL SMOT | 60d68d | 169d68d | n/a380d | n/an/a |
Trading data
MVAL | SMOT | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.21 | $39.98 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $39.65 | $40.33 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MVAL | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MVAL | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.21 | $39.98 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | -0.88% |
| AuM | $1.96 M | $320.96 M |
| E/R | 2.09% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
MVAL | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index (MSUBVFGU) | Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 110 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2024 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MVAL
USA
94.11%
Other
5.89%
SMOT
USA
95.22%
Other
4.78%
Sectors
MVAL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
31.86%
Healthcare
24.42%
Finance
12.35%
Technology
9.04%
Other
22.33%
SMOT
Healthcare
23.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
13.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.32%
Finance
12.05%
Industrials
11.46%
Technology
9.12%
Other
16.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
MVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.44%
SMOT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MVAL
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.75%
Danaher Corp.
4.55%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
4.51%
Kenvue, Inc.
4.31%
Brown-Forman Corp.
4.20%
The Clorox Co.
3.81%
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.67%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
3.65%
Microsoft Corp.
3.26%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.80%
Otis Worldwide Corp.
2.61%
NIKE, Inc.
2.61%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.60%
Masco Corp.
2.60%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.54%
SMOT
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
1.77%
Airbnb, Inc.
1.73%
Bio-Techne Corp.
1.64%
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
1.52%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.51%
Block, Inc.
1.49%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.49%
TransUnion
1.47%
Acuity, Inc.
1.45%
Amcor Plc
1.44%
The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc.
1.42%
Biogen, Inc.
1.42%
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.40%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
1.38%
Omnicom Group, Inc.
1.37%
Frequently asked questions about MVAL and SMOT
How have the MVAL and SMOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, MVAL is up 8.28% year-to-date (YTD), while SMOT has returned 10.45%. That puts SMOT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MVAL or SMOT?
Year-to-date, the MVAL ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$69M for SMOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: MVAL or SMOT?
Over the past year, MVAL had a volatility of 14.12%, while SMOT experienced 14.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: MVAL or SMOT?
As of October 23, 2026, MVAL holds $1.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMOT manages $320.96 M.
What sectors do the MVAL and SMOT ETFs invest in?
MVAL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, SMOT focuses on Healthcare, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the MVAL ETF and SMOT ETF?
MVAL top holdings include Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Danaher Corp. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. SMOT holds in its top three: IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Airbnb, Inc. and Bio-Techne Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MVAL or SMOT?
MVAL holds 45 securities with 52.44% of its assets in the top 15. SMOT has 110 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.49%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
