MVALvsMOATETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MVAL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, MOAT's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. MVAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.09%, versus 0.46% for MOAT. MVAL is up 8.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. MOAT performs worse with 8.24% YTD performance, and -$2.06B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MVAL and MOAT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MVAL vs MOAT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MVAL MOAT | +5.34%+3.73% | +6.33%+7.84% | +8.28%+8.24% | +11.83%+10.73% | n/a+58.75% | n/a+55.64% |
| Flows | MVAL MOAT | --$207M | +$1K-$531M | -$3M-$2.06B | -$3M-$2.22B | --$3.95B | -+$71M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MVAL MOAT | +14.78%+14.18% | +14.12%+13.96% | n/a+15.61% | n/a+18.40% |
| Max drawdown | MVAL MOAT | -9.78%-8.19% | -12.10%-12.41% | n/a-21.39% | n/a-23.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | MVAL MOAT | 60d57d | 169d193d | n/a226d | n/a571d |
Trading data
MVAL | MOAT | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.21 | $112.04 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $39.65 | $113.11 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MVAL | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MVAL | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.21 | $112.04 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | -0.95% |
| AuM | $1.96 M | $11.76 B |
| E/R | 2.09% | 0.46% |
Characteristics
MVAL | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index (MSUBVFGU) | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 55 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2024 | April 24, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MVAL
USA
94.11%
Other
5.89%
MOAT
USA
97.53%
Other
2.47%
Sectors
MVAL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
31.86%
Healthcare
24.42%
Finance
12.35%
Technology
9.04%
Other
22.33%
MOAT
Technology
22.41%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
22.19%
Healthcare
19.19%
Finance
14.56%
Business Services
7.58%
Other
14.07%
Advertisement
Diversification
MVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.44%
MOAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MVAL
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.75%
Danaher Corp.
4.55%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
4.51%
Kenvue, Inc.
4.31%
Brown-Forman Corp.
4.20%
The Clorox Co.
3.81%
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.67%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
3.65%
Microsoft Corp.
3.26%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.80%
Otis Worldwide Corp.
2.61%
NIKE, Inc.
2.61%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.60%
Masco Corp.
2.60%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.54%
MOAT
Veeva Systems, Inc.
3.47%
Airbnb, Inc.
2.99%
Microsoft Corp.
2.69%
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.67%
The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc.
2.60%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.60%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.55%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.55%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.53%
Danaher Corp.
2.47%
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
2.46%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.41%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
2.41%
Masco Corp.
2.39%
Kenvue, Inc.
2.36%
Frequently asked questions about MVAL and MOAT
How have the MVAL and MOAT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, MVAL is up 8.28% year-to-date (YTD), while MOAT has returned 8.24%. That puts MVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MVAL or MOAT?
Year-to-date, the MVAL ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$2.06B for MOAT.
Which ETF is more volatile: MVAL or MOAT?
Over the past year, MVAL had a volatility of 14.12%, while MOAT experienced 13.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: MVAL or MOAT?
As of October 23, 2026, MVAL holds $1.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOAT manages $11.76 B.
What sectors do the MVAL and MOAT ETFs invest in?
MVAL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, MOAT focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the MVAL ETF and MOAT ETF?
MVAL top holdings include Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Danaher Corp. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. MOAT holds in its top three: Veeva Systems, Inc., Airbnb, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MVAL or MOAT?
MVAL holds 45 securities with 52.44% of its assets in the top 15. MOAT has 55 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.14%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MVAL & MOAT
The ETF Underdogs, Part 9: Wide Moats and Competitive Advantages
July 7, 2026
MOAT
Invest like Warren Buffett with These Two ETFs
March 21, 2025
MOAT
Advertisement
Advertisement
