MUSEvsOACPETF Comparison
VS
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) belongs to the Intl Aggregate Bonds segment. OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. MUSE's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Utilities and Finance. In contrast, OACP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Utilities. MUSE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.74% for OACP. MUSE is up 1.51% year-to-date (YTD) with -$499K in YTD flows. OACP performs worse with -1.9% YTD performance, and +$82M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MUSE and OACP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MUSE vs OACP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MUSE OACP | -1.37%-0.36% | -1.37%-1.97% | +1.51%-1.90% | +2.82%-1.43% | n/a+15.89% | n/an/a |
| Flows | MUSE OACP | -+$20M | -+$30M | -$499K+$82M | -$11M+$98M | -+$185M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MUSE OACP | +2.61%+3.81% | +2.40%+3.47% | n/a+4.60% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MUSE OACP | -2.41%-3.27% | -2.41%-4.57% | n/a-4.59% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MUSE OACP | 50d88d | 50d228d | n/a284d | n/an/a |
Trading data
MUSE | OACP | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.06 | $21.90 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $48.05 | $21.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MUSE | OACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.06 | $21.90 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $37.52 M | $285.80 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.74% |
Characteristics
MUSE | OACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | TCW | OneAscent Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 170 | 173 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 15, 2024 | March 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MUSE
USA
31.6%
Other
68.4%
OACP
USA
46.26%
Other
53.74%
Sectors
MUSE
Sovereign
15.41%
Utilities
7.39%
Finance
7.14%
Other
70.06%
OACP
Industrials
17.46%
Finance
15.76%
Utilities
9.69%
Other
57.09%
Advertisement
Diversification
MUSE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.52%
OACP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MUSE
Tcw Central Cash Fund
1.86%
Romania, 6.375% 30jan2034, USD
1.11%
Ecopetrol, 5.875% 2nov2051, USD
1.08%
Samarco Mineracao, 4% 30jun2031, USD
1.03%
Abu Dhabi, 5.5% 30apr2054, USD
1.03%
Angola, 8.75% 14apr2032, USD (3)
0.98%
XAD2007ZAE79
0.90%
US05400KAJ97
0.89%
Nigeria, 7.696% 23feb2038, USD
0.84%
Saudi Arabia, 5% 18jan2053, USD
0.83%
Yinson Boronia Production, 8.947% 31jul2042, USD
0.82%
Istanbul Metropolitan Minicipality, 10.5% 6dec2028, USD
0.82%
Arches Buyer, 9% 15aug2031, USD
0.78%
Abu Dhabi, 5% 30apr2034, USD
0.77%
Philippines, 5.325% 24jun2036, USD
0.76%
OACP
US912810UX45
5.36%
USA, TIPS 1.25% 15apr2031, USD (X-2031)
2.95%
US91282CRH69
2.45%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2056, USD
1.89%
FN MA5353, 5.5% 1may2054, USD (ABS)
1.57%
US91282CRF04
1.17%
G2 MA8149, 3.5% 20jul2052, USD (ABS)
1.13%
Topaz Solar Farms, 5.75% 30sep2039, USD (A)
1.04%
FN MA4579, 3% 1apr2052, USD (ABS)
0.87%
US123915AE08
0.76%
Export Development Canada, 4.75% 5jun2034, USD (24-41)
0.75%
FN MA5331, 5.5% 1apr2054, USD (ABS)
0.75%
City of New York, 5.281% 1feb2038, USD (2026)
0.73%
US3132DWHE66
0.71%
FN MA4626, 4% 1jun2052, USD (ABS)
0.70%
Frequently asked questions about MUSE and OACP
How have the MUSE and OACP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MUSE is up 1.51% year-to-date (YTD), while OACP has lost -1.9%. That puts MUSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MUSE or OACP?
Year-to-date, the MUSE ETF saw -$499K in flows, compared to +$82M for OACP.
Which ETF is more volatile: MUSE or OACP?
Over the past year, MUSE had a volatility of 2.4%, while OACP experienced 3.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: MUSE or OACP?
As of October 16, 2026, MUSE holds $37.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while OACP manages $285.80 M.
What sectors do the MUSE and OACP ETFs invest in?
MUSE leans toward sectors like Sovereign, Utilities and Finance. Meanwhile, OACP focuses on Industrials, Finance and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the MUSE ETF and OACP ETF?
MUSE top holdings include Tcw Central Cash Fund, Romania, 6.375% 30jan2034, USD and Ecopetrol, 5.875% 2nov2051, USD. OACP holds in its top three: US912810UX45, USA, TIPS 1.25% 15apr2031, USD (X-2031) and US91282CRH69.
Which ETF is more diversified: MUSE or OACP?
MUSE holds 251 securities with 14.52% of its assets in the top 15. OACP has 278 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MUSE & OACP
Advertisement
