MSTQvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. MSTQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.59%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. MSTQ is up 13.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. LQDH performs worse with 3.32% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSTQ and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MSTQ vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSTQ LQDH | -3.03%-0.33% | +3.80%+1.25% | +13.30%+3.32% | +11.58%+4.82% | +82.58%+23.64% | n/a+29.37% |
| Flows | MSTQ LQDH | -+$28M | +$2M+$97M | +$6M+$27M | +$9M+$83M | +$26M+$346M | -+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSTQ LQDH | +19.64%+1.93% | +18.56%+2.56% | +17.81%+3.30% | n/a+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | MSTQ LQDH | -7.06%-0.60% | -12.32%-2.26% | -15.38%-4.48% | n/a-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | MSTQ LQDH | 13d27d | 121d82d | 148d104d | n/a437d |
Trading data
MSTQ | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.01 | $92.25 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $38.72 | $92.36 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MSTQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMSTQ | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MSTQ | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.01 | $92.25 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $39.96 M | $599.76 M |
| E/R | 1.59% | 0.44% |
Characteristics
MSTQ | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Little Harbor Advisor | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 15, 2022 | May 27, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about MSTQ and LQDH
How have the MSTQ and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, MSTQ is up 13.3% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.32%. That puts MSTQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MSTQ or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the MSTQ ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: MSTQ or LQDH?
Over the past year, MSTQ had a volatility of 18.56%, while LQDH experienced 2.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: MSTQ or LQDH?
As of October 19, 2026, MSTQ holds $39.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $599.76 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
