MSTQvsCLSEETF Comparison
VS
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. MSTQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.59%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. MSTQ is up 13.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 23.69% YTD performance, and +$659M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSTQ and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MSTQ vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/20/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSTQ CLSE | -3.18%-1.76% | +3.63%+0.46% | +13.12%+23.69% | +11.40%+31.58% | +84.18%+114.99% | n/an/a |
| Flows | MSTQ CLSE | -+$77M | +$2M+$263M | +$6M+$659M | +$9M+$692M | +$26M+$847M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSTQ CLSE | +19.50%+8.85% | +18.52%+13.01% | +17.80%+13.45% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MSTQ CLSE | -7.06%-3.12% | -12.32%-4.60% | -15.38%-15.76% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MSTQ CLSE | 13d43d | 121d40d | 148d188d | n/an/a |
Trading data
MSTQ | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.91 | $33.79 |
| Previous close 10/20/2026 | $39.01 | $33.91 |
| Consolidated volume 10/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MSTQ | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.91 | $33.79 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $39.90 M | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 1.59% | 1.52% |
Characteristics
MSTQ | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Little Harbor Advisor | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 15, 2022 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Sectors
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about MSTQ and CLSE
How have the MSTQ and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 20, 2026, MSTQ is up 13.12% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 23.69%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MSTQ or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the MSTQ ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$659M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: MSTQ or CLSE?
Over the past year, MSTQ had a volatility of 18.52%, while CLSE experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: MSTQ or CLSE?
As of October 20, 2026, MSTQ holds $39.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $1.02 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
