MSTQvsBFLXETF Comparison
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. MSTQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.59%, versus 0.4% for BFLX. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSTQ and BFLX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MSTQ vs BFLX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSTQ BFLX | +1.53%+1.41% | +1.38%+1.33% | +12.31%n/a | +11.07%n/a | +78.20%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MSTQ BFLX | -+$63M | +$2M+$1.41B | +$6M- | +$9M- | +$26M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSTQ BFLX | +19.69%+11.37% | +18.51%n/a | +17.80%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MSTQ BFLX | -7.06%-4.10% | -12.32%n/a | -15.38%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MSTQ BFLX | 13d64d | 121dn/a | 148dn/a | n/an/a |
MSTQ | BFLX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.72 | $25.72 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $39.39 | $25.95 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MSTQ | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.72 | $25.72 |
| 1D performance | -1.70% | -0.89% |
| AuM | $39.61 M | $2.18 B |
| E/R | 1.59% | 0.4% |
MSTQ | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Little Harbor Advisor | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 15, 2022 | May 19, 2026 |
| ESG | No | No |
