MSLCvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. MSLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.63%, versus 0.15% for IWB. MSLC is up 11.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$123M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 13.42% YTD performance, and -$2.89B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSLC and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MSLC vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSLC IWB | +0.78%+0.85% | +4.88%+5.59% | +11.47%+13.42% | +10.98%+12.91% | n/a+90.90% | n/a+73.13% |
| Flows | MSLC IWB | -$12M-$188M | -$18M-$744M | +$123M-$2.89B | +$207M-$1.27B | --$2.89B | --$2.96B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSLC IWB | +10.42%+10.82% | +12.36%+12.85% | n/a+15.08% | n/a+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | MSLC IWB | -3.56%-3.22% | -9.33%-8.86% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | MSLC IWB | 77d53d | 92d76d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
Trading data
MSLC | IWB | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.62 | $413.05 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $60.55 | $420.52 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MSLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.62 | $413.05 |
| 1D performance | -1.54% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $4.06 B | $48.91 B |
| E/R | 0.63% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
MSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Morgan Stanley | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 779 | 1012 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MSLC
USA
95.62%
Other
4.38%
IWB
USA
97.62%
Other
2.38%
Sectors
MSLC
Technology
43.83%
Finance
14.66%
Healthcare
8.82%
Industrials
8.61%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.13%
Other
15.95%
IWB
Technology
45.32%
Finance
13.38%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.32%
Industrials
7.85%
Other
15.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
MSLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.92%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
MSLC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.43%
Apple, Inc.
5.84%
Microsoft Corp.
5.69%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.52%
Broadcom Inc.
2.46%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.03%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.74%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.50%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.10%
Visa, Inc.
1.09%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.06%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.04%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.57%
Apple, Inc.
6.84%
Microsoft Corp.
5.41%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.85%
Broadcom Inc.
2.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.30%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.26%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.71%
Tesla, Inc.
1.47%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.41%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.31%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about MSLC and IWB
How have the MSLC and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, MSLC is up 11.47% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 13.42%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MSLC or IWB?
Year-to-date, the MSLC ETF saw +$123M in flows, compared to -$2.89B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: MSLC or IWB?
Over the past year, MSLC had a volatility of 12.36%, while IWB experienced 12.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: MSLC or IWB?
As of October 29, 2026, MSLC holds $4.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.91 B.
What sectors do the MSLC and IWB ETFs invest in?
MSLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the MSLC ETF and IWB ETF?
MSLC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MSLC or IWB?
MSLC holds 789 securities with 41.92% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
