MSLCvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF (MSLC) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. MSLC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. MSLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.63%, versus 0.15% for IWB. MSLC is up 7.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$142M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 9.16% YTD performance, and -$2.08B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSLC and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MSLC vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSLC IWB | -0.12%-0.97% | +3.28%+3.52% | +7.97%+9.16% | +14.62%+17.62% | n/a+66.71% | n/a+74.86% |
| Flows | MSLC IWB | -$29M+$225M | -$6M+$224M | +$142M-$2.08B | +$277M-$1.28B | --$2.68B | --$2.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSLC IWB | +12.62%+13.38% | +12.56%+13.01% | n/a+15.26% | n/a+17.31% |
| Max drawdown | MSLC IWB | -4.07%-4.33% | -9.33%-8.86% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | MSLC IWB | 58d58d | 92d76d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
Trading data
MSLC | IWB | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.10 | $408.38 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $58.67 | $405.80 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MSLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.10 | $408.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.73% | +0.64% |
| AuM | $3.95 B | $47.96 B |
| E/R | 0.63% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
MSLC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Morgan Stanley | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 986 | 1006 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MSLC
USA
94.24%
Other
5.76%
IWB
USA
97.26%
Other
2.74%
Sectors
MSLC
Technology
40.39%
Finance
15.35%
Industrials
9.53%
Healthcare
8.71%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.67%
Other
17.36%
IWB
Technology
43.33%
Finance
13.78%
Healthcare
8.9%
Industrials
8.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.46%
Other
16.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
MSLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.52%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MSLC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.37%
Apple, Inc.
5.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.29%
Microsoft Corp.
4.28%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.01%
Broadcom Inc.
2.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.11%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.06%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.52%
Tesla, Inc.
1.32%
Visa, Inc.
1.27%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.17%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.94%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.92%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
6.72%
Apple, Inc.
6.03%
Microsoft Corp.
3.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Broadcom Inc.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.87%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.78%
Tesla, Inc.
1.77%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.36%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Intel Corp.
0.88%
Frequently asked questions about MSLC and IWB
How have the MSLC and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, MSLC is up 7.97% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 9.16%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MSLC or IWB?
Year-to-date, the MSLC ETF saw +$142M in flows, compared to -$2.08B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: MSLC or IWB?
Over the past year, MSLC had a volatility of 12.56%, while IWB experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: MSLC or IWB?
As of July 30, 2026, MSLC holds $3.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $47.96 B.
What sectors do the MSLC and IWB ETFs invest in?
MSLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the MSLC ETF and IWB ETF?
MSLC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MSLC or IWB?
MSLC holds 1007 securities with 38.52% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.67%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
