MPROvsCGBLETF Comparison
VS
Monarch Procap ETF (MPRO) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) is part of the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. MPRO's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, CGBL's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MPRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.03%, versus 0.33% for CGBL. MPRO is up 7.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. CGBL performs worse with 5.85% YTD performance, and +$3.20B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MPRO and CGBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MPRO vs CGBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MPRO CGBL | +2.14%-0.05% | +0.39%-0.85% | +7.47%+5.85% | +7.34%+8.25% | +38.39%+54.73% | +31.40%n/a |
| Flows | MPRO CGBL | +$2M+$256M | -$862K+$874M | +$16M+$3.20B | +$29M+$3.91B | +$126M+$7.17B | +$164M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MPRO CGBL | +6.58%+8.52% | +6.88%+10.47% | +7.65%+10.95% | +9.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MPRO CGBL | -3.92%-4.17% | -5.67%-7.88% | -9.51%-11.64% | -14.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MPRO CGBL | 79d64d | 87d50d | 316d116d | 757dn/a |
Trading data
MPRO | CGBL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.63 | $36.85 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $32.51 | $37.09 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGBL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMPRO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MPRO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.63 | $36.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.37% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $254.55 M | $7.81 B |
| E/R | 1.03% | 0.33% |
Characteristics
MPRO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Monarch Fund | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | Solactive Kingsview ProCap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 10643 | 1072 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 24, 2021 | September 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MPRO
USA
87.16%
Other
12.84%
CGBL
USA
77.82%
Other
22.18%
Sectors
MPRO
Sovereign
23.56%
Finance
14.6%
Healthcare
11.16%
Technology
10.85%
Industrials
7.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.29%
Other
24.8%
CGBL
Technology
22.61%
Finance
14.49%
Industrials
10.65%
Sovereign
7.71%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.01%
Other
37.53%
Advertisement
Diversification
MPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.19%
CGBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MPRO
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.68%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.54%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Institutional
1.50%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.20%
Johnson & Johnson
1.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.03%
Tesla, Inc.
0.85%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.82%
AbbVie, Inc.
0.76%
NVIDIA Corp.
0.72%
Apple, Inc.
0.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.61%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
0.60%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.58%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.57%
CGBL
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
5.79%
Broadcom Inc.
4.42%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.64%
Microsoft Corp.
2.49%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.14%
Apple, Inc.
2.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.45%
Royal Gold, Inc.
1.28%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.27%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
ATI, Inc.
1.23%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
1.16%
US912810UX45
1.11%
Frequently asked questions about MPRO and CGBL
How have the MPRO and CGBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, MPRO is up 7.47% year-to-date (YTD), while CGBL has returned 5.85%. That puts MPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MPRO or CGBL?
Year-to-date, the MPRO ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$3.20B for CGBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: MPRO or CGBL?
Over the past year, MPRO had a volatility of 6.88%, while CGBL experienced 10.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: MPRO or CGBL?
As of October 15, 2026, MPRO holds $254.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGBL manages $7.81 B.
What sectors do the MPRO and CGBL ETFs invest in?
MPRO leans toward sectors like Sovereign, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CGBL focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MPRO ETF and CGBL ETF?
MPRO top holdings include Meta Platforms, Inc., Eli Lilly & Co. and BlackRock Cash Funds - Institutional. CGBL holds in its top three: Capital Group Central Cash Fund, Broadcom Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MPRO or CGBL?
MPRO holds 13680 securities with 14.19% of its assets in the top 15. CGBL has 1857 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MPRO & CGBL
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGBL
Advertisement
Advertisement
