MOTOvsFDRVETF Comparison
ETF 1
MOTO
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
This fund is part of
Smart City
-0.02%
VS
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transpo ETF (FDRV) belong to the same industry segment: Smart City. MOTO's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, FDRV's top sector exposures are Consumer Cyclicals, Technology and Industrials. MOTO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.02%, versus 0.39% for FDRV. MOTO is up 13.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$0K in YTD flows. FDRV performs worse with 3.78% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOTO and FDRV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOTO vs FDRV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOTO FDRV | -2.44%-4.92% | -12.66%-20.90% | +13.95%+3.78% | +25.97%+7.03% | +48.96%-6.80% | +37.99%n/a |
| Flows | MOTO FDRV | -- | -- | +$0K-$5M | +$0K-$5M | -$7M-$22M | -$7M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOTO FDRV | +25.93%+27.56% | +21.81%+24.13% | +20.88%+25.74% | +22.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MOTO FDRV | -15.67%-20.99% | -15.67%-20.99% | -25.12%-40.17% | -36.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MOTO FDRV | 91d92d | 91d92d | 328d954d | 1332dn/a |
Trading data
MOTO | FDRV | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.01 | $17.19 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $60.91 | $16.97 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOTO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMOTO | FDRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOTO | FDRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.01 | $17.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.16% | +1.30% |
| AuM | $9.15 M | $24.59 M |
| E/R | 1.02% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
MOTO | FDRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Guinness Atkinson | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 26, 2019 | October 5, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOTO
USA
41.05%
Germany
14.04%
Ireland
7.01%
Other
37.89%
FDRV
USA
44.09%
China
26.56%
Other
29.35%
Sectors
MOTO
Technology
44.27%
Consumer Cyclical.
26.61%
Industrials
22.15%
Other
6.97%
FDRV
Consumer Cyclical.
51.92%
Technology
24.69%
Industrials
21.5%
Other
1.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOTO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.89%
FDRV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MOTO
Quanta Services, Inc.
5.33%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.29%
Amphenol Corp.
4.52%
Infineon Technologies AG
4.51%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.23%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.12%
Analog Devices, Inc.
4.07%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.97%
Volvo AB
3.88%
Siemens AG
3.70%
Kia Corp.
3.13%
Sensata Technologies Holding Plc
3.04%
TE Connectivity Plc
3.04%
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
3.03%
Dana, Inc.
3.02%
FDRV
BYD Co., Ltd.
5.32%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
5.27%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
4.36%
NXP Semiconductors NV
4.32%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
4.02%
Tesla, Inc.
3.94%
Aptiv Plc
3.64%
Infineon Technologies AG
3.57%
Autoliv, Inc.
3.31%
Lear Corp.
3.27%
Lyft, Inc.
3.08%
Aurora Innovation, Inc.
3.08%
NIO, Inc.
3.04%
Li Auto, Inc.
3.02%
XPeng, Inc.
3.01%
Frequently asked questions about MOTO and FDRV
How have the MOTO and FDRV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, MOTO is up 13.95% year-to-date (YTD), while FDRV has returned 3.78%. That puts MOTO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOTO or FDRV?
Year-to-date, the MOTO ETF saw +$0K in flows, compared to -$5M for FDRV.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOTO or FDRV?
Over the past year, MOTO had a volatility of 21.81%, while FDRV experienced 24.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOTO or FDRV?
As of September 2, 2026, MOTO holds $9.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDRV manages $24.59 M.
What sectors do the MOTO and FDRV ETFs invest in?
MOTO leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, FDRV focuses on Consumer Cyclicals, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MOTO ETF and FDRV ETF?
MOTO top holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Amphenol Corp.. FDRV holds in its top three: BYD Co., Ltd., Uber Technologies, Inc. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MOTO or FDRV?
MOTO holds 38 securities with 58.89% of its assets in the top 15. FDRV has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.22%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOTO & FDRV
Advertisement
