MODLvsQLCETF Comparison
VS
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF (QLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. MODL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.26% for QLC. MODL is up 10.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$242M in YTD flows. QLC performs better with 13.95% YTD performance, and +$224M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MODL and QLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MODL vs QLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MODL QLC | -0.38%-1.46% | +3.49%+3.28% | +10.74%+13.95% | +14.56%+20.70% | +74.10%+91.63% | n/a+98.79% |
| Flows | MODL QLC | -$3M+$26M | +$13M+$69M | +$242M+$224M | +$313M+$321M | +$558M+$620M | -+$627M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MODL QLC | +10.48%+10.90% | +12.02%+13.07% | +14.19%+15.12% | n/a+17.11% |
| Max drawdown | MODL QLC | -2.83%-3.15% | -9.47%-8.90% | -17.64%-18.73% | n/a-23.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | MODL QLC | 15d35d | 72d63d | 124d124d | n/a702d |
Trading data
MODL | QLC | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.31 | $91.66 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $52.32 | $91.89 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MODL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMODL | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MODL | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.31 | $91.66 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $1.06 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
MODL | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | Northern Trust |
| Benchmark | - | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 355 | 176 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 11, 2022 | September 23, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MODL
USA
96.65%
Other
3.35%
QLC
USA
97.8%
Other
2.2%
Sectors
MODL
Technology
39.4%
Finance
19.78%
Healthcare
17.86%
Other
22.96%
QLC
Technology
45.38%
Finance
17.02%
Healthcare
9.91%
Other
27.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
MODL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.04%
QLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MODL
NVIDIA Corp.
6.05%
Apple, Inc.
5.85%
Microsoft Corp.
4.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.35%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.92%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.68%
Broadcom Inc.
2.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.32%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.23%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.12%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.77%
Visa, Inc.
1.50%
Johnson & Johnson
1.32%
Amgen, Inc.
1.25%
QLC
Apple, Inc.
7.31%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.65%
Broadcom Inc.
2.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.59%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.97%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.85%
Johnson & Johnson
1.81%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.65%
Bank of America Corp.
1.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.40%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.26%
GE Aerospace
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about MODL and QLC
How have the MODL and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, MODL is up 10.74% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has returned 13.95%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MODL or QLC?
Year-to-date, the MODL ETF saw +$242M in flows, compared to +$224M for QLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: MODL or QLC?
Over the past year, MODL had a volatility of 12.02%, while QLC experienced 13.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: MODL or QLC?
As of September 18, 2026, MODL holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $1.06 B.
What sectors do the MODL and QLC ETFs invest in?
MODL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the MODL ETF and QLC ETF?
MODL top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. QLC holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MODL or QLC?
MODL holds 361 securities with 42.04% of its assets in the top 15. QLC has 177 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
