MOATvsMVALETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MOAT's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. In contrast, MVAL's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Technology. MOAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.46%, versus 2.09% for MVAL. MOAT is up 13.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2.13B in YTD flows. MVAL performs better with 15.77% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOAT and MVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOAT vs MVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOAT MVAL | +9.43%+14.22% | +6.03%+7.53% | +13.89%+15.77% | +18.96%+22.15% | +62.92%n/a | +61.04%n/a |
| Flows | MOAT MVAL | -$217M+$971K | -$562M+$972K | -$2.13B-$3M | -$2.20B-$3M | -$4.19B- | -$31M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOAT MVAL | +14.94%+17.02% | +14.40%+14.93% | +15.61%n/a | +18.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MOAT MVAL | -8.19%-9.78% | -12.41%-12.10% | -21.39%n/a | -23.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MOAT MVAL | 68d67d | 193d169d | 226dn/a | 571dn/a |
Trading data
MOAT | MVAL | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $114.92 | $41.16 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $117.99 | $41.96 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOAT | MVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOAT | MVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $114.92 | $41.16 |
| 1D performance | -2.60% | -1.90% |
| AuM | $12.30 B | $3.14 M |
| E/R | 0.46% | 2.09% |
Characteristics
MOAT | MVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index | Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index (MSUBVFGU) |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 24, 2012 | March 26, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOAT
USA
97.28%
Other
2.72%
MVAL
USA
94.63%
Other
5.37%
Sectors
MOAT
Technology
24.86%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
23.66%
Healthcare
13.52%
Finance
10.25%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.21%
Business Services
7.27%
Other
11.23%
MVAL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
33.13%
Healthcare
18.04%
Technology
13.66%
Consumer Cyclical.
11.53%
Finance
9.72%
Other
13.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.52%
MVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
MOAT
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.06%
Danaher Corp.
2.87%
Microsoft Corp.
2.86%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.63%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.54%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.52%
The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc.
2.51%
Brown-Forman Corp.
2.49%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
2.48%
Kenvue, Inc.
2.46%
Tractor Supply Co.
2.44%
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.43%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
2.43%
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
2.42%
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.38%
MVAL
Danaher Corp.
4.95%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
4.38%
Brown-Forman Corp.
4.29%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
4.26%
Kenvue, Inc.
4.24%
Tractor Supply Co.
4.20%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
4.18%
Mondelez International, Inc.
4.10%
McCormick & Co., Inc.
4.06%
NIKE, Inc.
3.80%
The Clorox Co.
3.75%
Microsoft Corp.
3.72%
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.68%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.35%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.87%
Frequently asked questions about MOAT and MVAL
How have the MOAT and MVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, MOAT is up 13.89% year-to-date (YTD), while MVAL has returned 15.77%. That puts MVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOAT or MVAL?
Year-to-date, the MOAT ETF saw -$2.13B in flows, compared to -$3M for MVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOAT or MVAL?
Over the past year, MOAT had a volatility of 14.4%, while MVAL experienced 14.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOAT or MVAL?
As of November 4, 2026, MOAT holds $12.30 B in assets under management (AUM), while MVAL manages $3.14 M.
What sectors do the MOAT and MVAL ETFs invest in?
MOAT leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. Meanwhile, MVAL focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MOAT ETF and MVAL ETF?
MOAT top holdings include Meta Platforms, Inc., Danaher Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. MVAL holds in its top three: Danaher Corp., Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Brown-Forman Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MOAT or MVAL?
MOAT holds 54 securities with 38.52% of its assets in the top 15. MVAL has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOAT & MVAL
The ETF Underdogs, Part 9: Wide Moats and Competitive Advantages
July 7, 2026
MOAT
Invest like Warren Buffett with These Two ETFs
March 21, 2025
MOAT
Advertisement
Advertisement
