MOATvsGSEWETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MOAT's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. In contrast, GSEW's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MOAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.46%, versus 0.09% for GSEW. MOAT is up 13.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2.13B in YTD flows. GSEW performs better with 16.92% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOAT and GSEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOAT vs GSEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOAT GSEW | +9.43%+3.90% | +6.03%+1.50% | +13.89%+16.92% | +18.96%+19.48% | +62.92%+72.76% | +61.04%+48.80% |
| Flows | MOAT GSEW | -$217M+$139M | -$562M+$255M | -$2.13B+$492M | -$2.20B+$590M | -$4.19B+$1.29B | -$31M+$963M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOAT GSEW | +14.94%+10.28% | +14.40%+12.09% | +15.61%+14.18% | +18.46%+17.00% |
| Max drawdown | MOAT GSEW | -8.19%-5.91% | -12.41%-7.73% | -21.39%-18.23% | -23.94%-25.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOAT GSEW | 68d80d | 193d49d | 226d211d | 571d834d |
Trading data
MOAT | GSEW | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $114.92 | $94.92 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $117.99 | $98.51 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOAT | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOAT | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $114.92 | $94.92 |
| 1D performance | -2.60% | -3.64% |
| AuM | $12.30 B | $2.26 B |
| E/R | 0.46% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
MOAT | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index | Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 492 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 24, 2012 | December 11, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOAT
USA
97.28%
Other
2.72%
GSEW
USA
94.11%
Other
5.89%
Sectors
MOAT
Technology
24.86%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
23.66%
Healthcare
13.52%
Finance
10.25%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.21%
Business Services
7.27%
Other
11.23%
GSEW
Technology
19.55%
Finance
18.95%
Industrials
14.55%
Healthcare
11.61%
Other
35.34%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.52%
GSEW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
MOAT
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.06%
Danaher Corp.
2.87%
Microsoft Corp.
2.86%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.63%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.54%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.52%
The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc.
2.51%
Brown-Forman Corp.
2.49%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
2.48%
Kenvue, Inc.
2.46%
Tractor Supply Co.
2.44%
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.43%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
2.43%
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
2.42%
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.38%
GSEW
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.28%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.28%
Intel Corp.
0.28%
Everpure, Inc.
0.28%
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.27%
Moderna, Inc.
0.27%
Strategy, Inc.
0.27%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.26%
Natera, Inc.
0.26%
Illumina, Inc.
0.26%
Datadog, Inc.
0.26%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.26%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
0.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.26%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.26%
Frequently asked questions about MOAT and GSEW
How have the MOAT and GSEW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, MOAT is up 13.89% year-to-date (YTD), while GSEW has returned 16.92%. That puts GSEW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOAT or GSEW?
Year-to-date, the MOAT ETF saw -$2.13B in flows, compared to +$492M for GSEW.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOAT or GSEW?
Over the past year, MOAT had a volatility of 14.4%, while GSEW experienced 12.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOAT or GSEW?
As of November 4, 2026, MOAT holds $12.30 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSEW manages $2.26 B.
What sectors do the MOAT and GSEW ETFs invest in?
MOAT leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. Meanwhile, GSEW focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MOAT ETF and GSEW ETF?
MOAT top holdings include Meta Platforms, Inc., Danaher Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. GSEW holds in its top three: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and Intel Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MOAT or GSEW?
MOAT holds 54 securities with 38.52% of its assets in the top 15. GSEW has 492 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.02%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOAT & GSEW
The ETF Underdogs, Part 9: Wide Moats and Competitive Advantages
July 7, 2026
MOAT
Invest like Warren Buffett with These Two ETFs
March 21, 2025
MOAT
Advertisement
Advertisement
