Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MNZLvsLCTUETF Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. MNZL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, LCTU's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. MNZL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. MNZL is down -1.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. LCTU performs worse with -3.95% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MNZL and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MNZL vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MNZL LCTU | -4.92%-3.75% | -1.98%-3.99% | -1.47%-3.95% | n/a+16.71% | n/a+69.90% | n/an/a |
| Flows | MNZL LCTU | +$2M-$41M | +$4M-$20M | +$3M-$24M | --$16M | --$643M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MNZL LCTU | +13.48%+12.16% | n/a+18.45% | n/a+15.06% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MNZL LCTU | -6.20%-5.70% | n/a-14.18% | n/a-19.80% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MNZL LCTU | 36d66d | n/a45d | n/a127d | n/an/a |
MNZL | LCTU | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.98 | $69.86 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $50.87 | $70.99 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MNZL | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MNZL | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.98 | $69.86 |
| 1D performance | -1.74% | -1.59% |
| AuM | $4.57 M | $1.34 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.3% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MNZL and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 19, 2026, MNZL is down -1.47% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has lost -3.95%. That puts MNZL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MNZL or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the MNZL ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$24M for LCTU.
Which ETF is bigger: MNZL or LCTU?
As of March 19, 2026, MNZL holds $4.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.34 B.
What sectors do the MNZL and LCTU ETFs invest in?
MNZL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MNZL ETF and LCTU ETF?
MNZL top holdings include APPLE, BROADCOM LIMITED and TESLA. LCTU holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MNZL or LCTU?
MNZL holds 445 securities with 43.54% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 315 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.52%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
