Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MNZLvsIWBETF Comparison
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. MNZL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. MNZL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for IWB. MNZL is down -1.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with -2.92% YTD performance, and +$336M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MNZL and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MNZL vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MNZL IWB | -5.17%-3.69% | -1.03%-1.98% | -1.38%-2.92% | n/a+19.03% | n/a+73.30% | n/a+74.44% |
| Flows | MNZL IWB | +$2M+$550M | +$4M+$560M | +$3M+$336M | -+$1.63B | --$354M | -+$726M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MNZL IWB | +13.61%+12.39% | n/a+18.34% | n/a+14.98% | n/a+17.13% |
| Max drawdown | MNZL IWB | -6.11%-4.93% | n/a-13.95% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | MNZL IWB | 35d50d | n/a45d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
MNZL | IWB | |
Last sale 3/19/2026 at 2:13 PM | $50.73 | $359.64 |
| Previous close 03/18/2026 | $50.85 | $361.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MNZL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MNZL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.73 | $359.64 |
| 1D performance | -0.24% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $4.57 M | $45.16 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MNZL and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 18, 2026, MNZL is down -1.38% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has lost -2.92%. That puts MNZL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MNZL or IWB?
Year-to-date, the MNZL ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$336M for IWB.
Which ETF is bigger: MNZL or IWB?
As of March 18, 2026, MNZL holds $4.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $45.16 B.
What sectors do the MNZL and IWB ETFs invest in?
MNZL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the MNZL ETF and IWB ETF?
MNZL top holdings include APPLE, BROADCOM LIMITED and TESLA. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MNZL or IWB?
MNZL holds 445 securities with 43.62% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1008 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.55%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
