MNRSvsDAPPETF Comparison
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) belong to the same industry segment: Cryptocurrency. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance and Technology. MNRS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.52% for DAPP. MNRS is up 11.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. DAPP performs worse with 7.67% YTD performance, and -$114M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MNRS and DAPP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MNRS vs DAPP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MNRS DAPP | -21.77%-10.75% | -0.57%-3.39% | +11.97%+7.67% | +20.88%-1.11% | n/a+122.49% | n/a-15.18% |
| Flows | MNRS DAPP | +$86K-$90M | +$1M-$239M | +$1M-$114M | +$6M-$46M | -+$58M | -+$143M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MNRS DAPP | +74.13%+58.67% | +72.61%+62.09% | n/a+68.60% | n/a+71.99% |
| Max drawdown | MNRS DAPP | -35.86%-25.80% | -56.76%-47.43% | n/a-58.49% | n/a-91.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | MNRS DAPP | 57d57d | 286d286d | n/a276d | n/a1723d |
MNRS | DAPP | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.02 | $16.35 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $33.49 | $17.76 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MNRS | DAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MNRS | DAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.02 | $16.35 |
| 1D performance | -10.36% | -7.94% |
| AuM | $11.75 M | $230.71 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.52% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
