New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

MNBDvsGNMAETF Comparison

ETF 1
MNBD

ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
-0%
VS
ETF 2
GNMA

iShares GNMA Bond ETF

This fund is part of
MBS & ABS
-0.04%

ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) belongs to the Municipal Bonds segment. iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) is part of the MBS & ABS segment. MNBD's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, GNMA's top sector exposures are Industrials and Non-Corporate. MNBD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.11% for GNMA. MNBD is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. GNMA performs worse with -1.65% YTD performance, and +$36M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MNBD and GNMA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

MNBD vs GNMA performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

-15 M-10 M-5 M0 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
MNBD
GNMA
-0.21%-0.41%
-2.59%-2.53%
-1.14%-1.65%
-0.43%-1.41%
+10.99%+15.95%
n/a+0.31%
Flows
MNBD
GNMA
+$8K-$15M
+$666K+$7M
+$14M+$36M
+$15M+$69M
+$25M+$124M
--$12M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
MNBD
GNMA
+4.40%+5.77%
+2.76%+4.49%
+3.13%+5.59%
n/a+6.56%
Max drawdown
MNBD
GNMA
-4.77%-4.45%
-5.40%-5.36%
-5.40%-5.36%
n/a-15.48%
Max drawdown duration
MNBD
GNMA
89d52d
229d229d
229d229d
n/a1397d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
MNBD
GNMA
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
$25.00
$42.27
Previous close
10/15/2026
$24.99
$42.26
Consolidated volume
10/15/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

MNBD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
MNBD
GNMA
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MNBD
GNMA
Last price
$25.00
$42.27
1D performance
+0.08%
+0.02%
AuM$55.04 M$416.20 M
E/R0.44%0.11%
Characteristics
MNBD
GNMA
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderALPSiShares
Benchmark-Bloomberg U.S. GNMA Bond Index
N° of holdings88109
Asset class-Bonds
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateMay 19, 2022February 14, 2012
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

MNBD
USA
46.14%
Other
53.86%
GNMA
USA
48.8%
Other
51.2%

Sectors

MNBD
Municipal
45.97%
Other
54.03%
GNMA
Industrials
39.92%
Non-Corporate
8.88%
Other
51.2%
Advertisement

Diversification

MNBD

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

19.63%
GNMA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

33.91%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
MNBD
US84136HCT86
1.86%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4.005% 1dec2041, USD (2012B)
1.62%
Tarrant Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., FRN 15nov2063, USD (2026A&B)
1.58%
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 0% 1dec2037, USD (8799D)
1.50%
Freddie Mac Multifamily Variable Rate Certificates, FRN 25aug2041, USD
1.48%
US83712D4A17
1.48%
Salt Verde Financial Corp., 5% 1dec2032, USD (2007-1)
1.24%
New York Dormitory Authority, 4% 15feb2047, USD (2019D)
1.22%
US6582074E20
1.18%
Wyoming Community Development Authority, 3.5% 1jun2052, USD (2022)
1.13%
US01728LFH06
1.10%
San Mateo Union High School District, 0% 1sep2041, USD (2011A)
1.08%
Modesto Irrigation District, FRN 1sep2037, USD (2007F)
1.06%
US57584Y8C61
1.05%
US451295ZZ58
1.05%
GNMA
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
8.88%
G2 MA7192, 2% 20feb2051, USD (ABS)
2.59%
US3618N5XQ77
2.51%
G2 MA9360, 4.5% 20dec2053, USD (ABS)
2.42%
US21H0526945
1.97%
US36179WTX64
1.90%
G2 MA8878, 5% 20may2053, USD (ABS)
1.67%
G2 MB0025, 5% 20nov2054, USD (ABS)
1.64%
US36179WJR07
1.62%
G2 MA7880, 2% 20feb2052, USD (ABS)
1.59%
G2 MA8801, 5.5% 20apr2053, USD (ABS)
1.59%
G2 MA6864, 2% 20sep2050, USD (ABS)
1.44%
US36179WLP13
1.40%
US36179WFG87
1.38%
US3617NWEY42
1.32%
Frequently asked questions about MNBD and GNMA

How have the MNBD and GNMA ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, MNBD is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while GNMA has lost -1.65%. That puts MNBD better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MNBD or GNMA?

Year-to-date, the MNBD ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to +$36M for GNMA.

Which ETF is more volatile: MNBD or GNMA?

Over the past year, MNBD had a volatility of 2.76%, while GNMA experienced 4.49%.

Which ETF is bigger: MNBD or GNMA?

As of October 16, 2026, MNBD holds $55.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while GNMA manages $416.20 M.

What sectors do the MNBD and GNMA ETFs invest in?

MNBD leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, GNMA focuses on Industrials and Non-Corporate.

What are the top holdings of the MNBD ETF and GNMA ETF?

MNBD top holdings include US84136HCT86, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4.005% 1dec2041, USD (2012B) and Tarrant Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., FRN 15nov2063, USD (2026A&B). GNMA holds in its top three: BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, G2 MA7192, 2% 20feb2051, USD (ABS) and US3618N5XQ77.

Which ETF is more diversified: MNBD or GNMA?

MNBD holds 198 securities with 19.63% of its assets in the top 15. GNMA has 355 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.91%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026