MNBDvsCGHMETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. MNBD's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, CGHM's top sector exposures are Municipal. MNBD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.34% for CGHM. MNBD is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. CGHM performs worse with -1.27% YTD performance, and +$1.21B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MNBD and CGHM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MNBD vs CGHM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MNBD CGHM | -0.21%-0.63% | -2.59%-3.99% | -1.14%-1.27% | -0.43%-0.65% | +10.99%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MNBD CGHM | +$8K+$300M | +$666K+$501M | +$14M+$1.21B | +$15M+$1.42B | +$25M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MNBD CGHM | +4.40%+5.57% | +2.76%+3.65% | +3.13%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MNBD CGHM | -4.77%-6.27% | -5.40%-6.96% | -5.40%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MNBD CGHM | 89d92d | 229d110d | 229dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
MNBD | CGHM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.00 | $24.42 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $24.99 | $24.43 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MNBD | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.00 | $24.42 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $55.04 M | $3.56 B |
| E/R | 0.44% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
MNBD | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | ALPS | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 845 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 19, 2022 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MNBD
USA
46.14%
Other
53.86%
CGHM
USA
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Sectors
MNBD
Municipal
45.97%
Other
54.03%
CGHM
Municipal
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
MNBD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.63%
CGHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MNBD
US84136HCT86
1.86%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4.005% 1dec2041, USD (2012B)
1.62%
Tarrant Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., FRN 15nov2063, USD (2026A&B)
1.58%
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 0% 1dec2037, USD (8799D)
1.50%
Freddie Mac Multifamily Variable Rate Certificates, FRN 25aug2041, USD
1.48%
US83712D4A17
1.48%
Salt Verde Financial Corp., 5% 1dec2032, USD (2007-1)
1.24%
New York Dormitory Authority, 4% 15feb2047, USD (2019D)
1.22%
US6582074E20
1.18%
Wyoming Community Development Authority, 3.5% 1jun2052, USD (2022)
1.13%
US01728LFH06
1.10%
San Mateo Union High School District, 0% 1sep2041, USD (2011A)
1.08%
Modesto Irrigation District, FRN 1sep2037, USD (2007F)
1.06%
US57584Y8C61
1.05%
US451295ZZ58
1.05%
CGHM
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD
1.31%
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD
0.86%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD
0.61%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0% 1jul2046, USD (10001D)
0.53%
US419800PW17
0.50%
Chicago Board of Education, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2012A)
0.44%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, 4% 1sep2046, USD (2026A)
0.43%
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, 5% 1jul2047, USD (2020A)
0.42%
City of New York, FRN 1apr2042, USD
0.35%
Capital Trust Agency, 5% 1jul2056, USD (2021A-1)
0.34%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jun2036, USD (2026)
0.33%
US83703FLR19
0.33%
US45203HAH57
0.33%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1jun2034, USD (2026)
0.32%
US79768HKN79
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about MNBD and CGHM
How have the MNBD and CGHM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MNBD is down -1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while CGHM has lost -1.27%. That puts MNBD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MNBD or CGHM?
Year-to-date, the MNBD ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to +$1.21B for CGHM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MNBD or CGHM?
Over the past year, MNBD had a volatility of 2.76%, while CGHM experienced 3.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: MNBD or CGHM?
As of October 16, 2026, MNBD holds $55.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGHM manages $3.56 B.
What sectors do the MNBD and CGHM ETFs invest in?
MNBD leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CGHM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the MNBD ETF and CGHM ETF?
MNBD top holdings include US84136HCT86, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4.005% 1dec2041, USD (2012B) and Tarrant Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., FRN 15nov2063, USD (2026A&B). CGHM holds in its top three: Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD, Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD and Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: MNBD or CGHM?
MNBD holds 198 securities with 19.63% of its assets in the top 15. CGHM has 2608 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
