Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MMTMvsLGHETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) is part of the segment. MMTM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, LGH's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. MMTM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 1% for LGH. MMTM is up 0.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$560K in YTD flows. LGH performs worse with -2.31% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MMTM and LGH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MMTM vs LGH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MMTM LGH | -2.24%-3.15% | -0.95%-3.24% | +0.27%-2.31% | +23.17%+24.68% | +86.14%+84.98% | +87.52%+79.44% |
| Flows | MMTM LGH | -- | +$6M-$3M | +$560K-$3M | -$4M+$26M | +$37M+$110M | +$22M+$244M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MMTM LGH | +15.09%+16.11% | +20.97%+17.89% | +17.47%+16.87% | +18.26%+16.76% |
| Max drawdown | MMTM LGH | -4.37%-5.38% | -15.18%-11.27% | -21.93%-18.42% | -23.80%-29.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | MMTM LGH | 14d57d | 48d48d | 155d206d | 708d806d |
MMTM | LGH | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $292.50 | $60.44 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $292.20 | $60.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MMTM | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MMTM | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $292.50 | $60.44 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $163.84 M | $563.21 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 1% |
MMTM | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 1402 | 393 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2012 | October 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MMTM and LGH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MMTM is up 0.27% year-to-date (YTD), while LGH has lost -2.31%. That puts MMTM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MMTM or LGH?
Year-to-date, the MMTM ETF saw +$560K in flows, compared to -$3M for LGH.
Which ETF is more volatile: MMTM or LGH?
Over the past year, MMTM had a volatility of 20.97%, while LGH experienced 17.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: MMTM or LGH?
As of March 11, 2026, MMTM holds $163.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while LGH manages $563.21 M.
What sectors do the MMTM and LGH ETFs invest in?
MMTM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, LGH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MMTM ETF and LGH ETF?
MMTM top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. LGH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MMTM or LGH?
MMTM holds 1484 securities with 49.81% of its assets in the top 15. LGH has 405 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.6%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
