Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MMTMvsFBUFETF Comparison
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. MMTM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, FBUF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. MMTM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.52% for FBUF. MMTM is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$560K in YTD flows. FBUF performs better with 0.21% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MMTM and FBUF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MMTM vs FBUF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MMTM FBUF | -2.21%-1.17% | -1.10%+0.43% | +0.17%+0.21% | +22.78%+17.29% | +85.16%n/a | +90.58%n/a |
| Flows | MMTM FBUF | -+$794K | +$6M+$3M | +$560K+$2M | -$4M+$7M | +$37M- | +$22M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MMTM FBUF | +15.09%+7.92% | +20.98%+10.59% | +17.47%n/a | +18.28%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MMTM FBUF | -4.37%-1.84% | -15.18%-7.83% | -21.93%n/a | -23.80%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MMTM FBUF | 13d36d | 48d59d | 155dn/a | 708dn/a |
MMTM | FBUF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $292.50 | $30.91 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $292.20 | $30.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MMTM | FBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MMTM | FBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $292.50 | $30.91 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | +0.11% |
| AuM | $163.68 M | $19.31 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.52% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MMTM and FBUF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, MMTM is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD), while FBUF has returned 0.21%. That puts FBUF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MMTM or FBUF?
Year-to-date, the MMTM ETF saw +$560K in flows, compared to +$2M for FBUF.
Which ETF is more volatile: MMTM or FBUF?
Over the past year, MMTM had a volatility of 20.98%, while FBUF experienced 10.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: MMTM or FBUF?
As of March 10, 2026, MMTM holds $163.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while FBUF manages $19.31 M.
What sectors do the MMTM and FBUF ETFs invest in?
MMTM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, FBUF focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the MMTM ETF and FBUF ETF?
MMTM top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. FBUF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MMTM or FBUF?
MMTM holds 1484 securities with 49.81% of its assets in the top 15. FBUF has 146 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.44%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
