Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MMLGvsTCHPETF Comparison
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. MMLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.57% for TCHP. MMLG is down -8.37% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. TCHP performs better with -6.3% YTD performance, and +$211M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MMLG and TCHP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MMLG vs TCHP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MMLG TCHP | -0.62%-1.66% | -8.53%-7.25% | -8.37%-6.30% | +16.12%+22.46% | +85.00%+113.93% | +33.50%+63.67% |
| Flows | MMLG TCHP | -+$42M | -$2M+$236M | -$2M+$211M | +$5M+$587M | +$13M+$1.06B | +$80M+$1.33B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MMLG TCHP | +19.35%+15.97% | +24.82%+23.19% | +21.26%+20.03% | +25.36%+23.76% |
| Max drawdown | MMLG TCHP | -10.56%-8.63% | -17.15%-15.38% | -26.54%-22.89% | -45.91%-42.43% |
| Max drawdown duration | MMLG TCHP | 74d73d | 43d45d | 128d152d | 1055d830d |
MMLG | TCHP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.10 | $45.30 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.44 | $45.80 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MMLG | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.10 | $45.30 |
| 1D performance | -1.04% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $81.14 M | $1.81 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.57% |
MMLG | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 44 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 21, 2020 | June 23, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MMLG and TCHP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, MMLG is down -8.37% year-to-date (YTD), while TCHP has lost -6.3%. That puts TCHP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MMLG or TCHP?
Year-to-date, the MMLG ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$211M for TCHP.
Which ETF is more volatile: MMLG or TCHP?
Over the past year, MMLG had a volatility of 24.82%, while TCHP experienced 23.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: MMLG or TCHP?
As of March 12, 2026, MMLG holds $81.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while TCHP manages $1.81 B.
What sectors do the MMLG and TCHP ETFs invest in?
MMLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, TCHP focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MMLG ETF and TCHP ETF?
MMLG top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and MICROSOFT-T. TCHP holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: MMLG or TCHP?
MMLG holds 72 securities with 60.47% of its assets in the top 15. TCHP has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.09%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
