MMCAvsJMSIETF Comparison
VS
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF (MMCA) belongs to the Municipal Bonds segment. JPMorgan Sustainable Municipal Income ETF (JMSI) is part of the Multiple Trends segment. MMCA's top 1 sector exposures are Municipal. In contrast, JMSI's top sector exposures are Municipal and Sovereign. MMCA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.5% for JMSI. MMCA is down -2.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. JMSI performs better with -2.1% YTD performance, and +$53M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MMCA and JMSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MMCA vs JMSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MMCA JMSI | -0.54%-0.26% | -3.25%-3.12% | -2.54%-2.10% | -1.81%-1.43% | +11.12%+11.08% | n/an/a |
| Flows | MMCA JMSI | +$9M+$5M | +$11M+$5M | +$33M+$53M | +$43M+$73M | +$67M+$165M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MMCA JMSI | +4.73%+4.88% | +2.98%+3.09% | +3.12%+3.37% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MMCA JMSI | -5.42%-5.47% | -6.73%-6.30% | -6.73%-6.30% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MMCA JMSI | 64d92d | 229d229d | 229d229d | n/an/a |
Trading data
MMCA | JMSI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.81 | $47.94 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $20.78 | $48.15 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MMCA | JMSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.81 | $47.94 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | -0.44% |
| AuM | $97.66 M | $378.66 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
MMCA | JMSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | New York Life Investments | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 92 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2021 | July 14, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MMCA
USA
31.29%
Other
68.71%
JMSI
USA
33.98%
Other
66.02%
Sectors
MMCA
Municipal
31.29%
Other
68.71%
JMSI
Municipal
32.93%
Other
67.07%
Advertisement
Diversification
MMCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.09%
JMSI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MMCA
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1oct2034, USD (2026G)
2.63%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5.25% 1feb2036, USD (2026C)
2.22%
US13013JCM62
2.20%
California Public Works Board, 5% 1sep2035, USD (2026)
2.06%
US120827ES50
2.00%
US13077DYV80
1.80%
US544446BN68
1.72%
San Jose (CA), 3.05% 1may2066, USD (2026A)
1.57%
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, 3.25% 1jun2033, USD (2026)
1.55%
Puerto Rico, 4% 1jul2037, USD
1.52%
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, 0% 15jan2035, USD (2015A, 7270D)
1.49%
California, 5% 1sep2039, USD
1.41%
US13032UWT14
1.33%
US845389PU30
1.30%
US13050WAL54
1.28%
JMSI
US64972GC444
1.79%
US25484JDJ60
1.26%
US167560YF20
1.18%
US650860AZ26
1.11%
Texas Water Development Board, 4% 15oct2044, USD (2019A)
1.11%
US64972GR970
1.07%
USA, Bills 0% 10sep2026, USD (182D)
1.05%
Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority, 5.25% 1oct2045, USD (2025A)
1.03%
US71783DDS18
0.92%
US161045RK79
0.89%
US928103BH24
0.83%
US89602HHW07
0.79%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.79%
US5920983E56
0.76%
US89602HJB42
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about MMCA and JMSI
How have the MMCA and JMSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MMCA is down -2.54% year-to-date (YTD), while JMSI has lost -2.1%. That puts JMSI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MMCA or JMSI?
Year-to-date, the MMCA ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$53M for JMSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: MMCA or JMSI?
Over the past year, MMCA had a volatility of 2.98%, while JMSI experienced 3.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: MMCA or JMSI?
As of October 16, 2026, MMCA holds $97.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while JMSI manages $378.66 M.
What sectors do the MMCA and JMSI ETFs invest in?
MMCA leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, JMSI focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the MMCA ETF and JMSI ETF?
MMCA top holdings include California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1oct2034, USD (2026G), California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5.25% 1feb2036, USD (2026C) and US13013JCM62. JMSI holds in its top three: US64972GC444, US25484JDJ60 and US167560YF20.
Which ETF is more diversified: MMCA or JMSI?
MMCA holds 120 securities with 26.09% of its assets in the top 15. JMSI has 287 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.31%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
