MLPXvsUMIETF Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. MLPX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.85% for UMI. MLPX is up 30.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$365M in YTD flows. UMI performs worse with 28.77% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MLPX and UMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MLPX vs UMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MLPX UMI | +5.13%+5.72% | +8.66%+10.02% | +30.15%+28.77% | +32.18%+32.94% | +107.16%+95.59% | +182.57%+165.91% |
| Flows | MLPX UMI | +$70M+$13M | +$110M+$8M | +$365M+$19M | +$409M+$38M | +$1.51B+$110M | +$1.59B+$195M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MLPX UMI | +19.64%+18.44% | +15.38%+14.27% | +17.01%+16.22% | +19.77%+19.24% |
| Max drawdown | MLPX UMI | -7.51%-6.54% | -8.32%-7.51% | -16.47%-16.88% | -19.62%-20.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | MLPX UMI | 66d64d | 109d66d | 370d370d | 427d492d |
MLPX | UMI | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $77.14 | $62.00 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $77.56 | $62.02 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MLPX | UMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MLPX | UMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.14 | $62.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.54% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $3.72 B | $518.62 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.85% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15