MLPXvsPIPEETF Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. MLPX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.75% for PIPE. MLPX is up 24.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$287M in YTD flows. PIPE performs better with 26.75% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MLPX and PIPE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MLPX vs PIPE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MLPX PIPE | +0.94%+0.75% | +3.36%+5.37% | +24.63%+26.75% | +25.02%+29.37% | +112.15%n/a | +152.55%n/a |
| Flows | MLPX PIPE | +$38M+$1M | +$226M+$2M | +$287M+$1M | +$307M+$29M | +$1.41B- | +$1.54B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MLPX PIPE | +18.01%+17.46% | +15.26%+14.45% | +16.88%n/a | +19.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MLPX PIPE | -7.51%-6.97% | -8.32%-7.30% | -16.47%n/a | -19.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MLPX PIPE | 23d23d | 109d109d | 370dn/a | 427dn/a |
MLPX | PIPE | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.38 | $30.13 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $73.96 | $30.00 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MLPX | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MLPX | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.38 | $30.13 |
| 1D performance | +0.56% | +0.42% |
| AuM | $3.48 B | $64.39 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.75% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
