Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MLPIvsMLPDETF Comparison
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. MLPI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.68%, versus 0.6% for MLPD. MLPI is up 13.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$342M in YTD flows. MLPD performs worse with 4.76% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MLPI and MLPD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MLPI vs MLPD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MLPI MLPD | +3.02%+1.45% | +15.71%+5.66% | +13.61%+4.76% | n/a+18.70% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MLPI MLPD | +$179M+$3M | +$369M+$7M | +$342M+$6M | -+$10M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MLPI MLPD | +11.66%+10.36% | n/a+14.64% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MLPI MLPD | -2.47%-1.68% | n/a-12.85% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MLPI MLPD | 11d8d | n/a61d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MLPI | MLPD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.77 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.76 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MLPI | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MLPI | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $25.77 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.04% |
| AuM | $385.18 M | $20.21 M |
| E/R | 0.68% | 0.6% |
MLPI | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2025 | May 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MLPI and MLPD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, MLPI is up 13.61% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPD has returned 4.76%. That puts MLPI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MLPI or MLPD?
Year-to-date, the MLPI ETF saw +$342M in flows, compared to +$6M for MLPD.
Which ETF is bigger: MLPI or MLPD?
As of March 12, 2026, MLPI holds $385.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPD manages $20.21 M.
What sectors do the MLPI and MLPD ETFs invest in?
MLPI leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, MLPD focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MLPI ETF and MLPD ETF?
MLPI top holdings include WILLIAMS, ENBRIDGE and TC ENERGY CORP. MLPD holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: MLPI or MLPD?
MLPI holds 24 securities with 82.72% of its assets in the top 15. MLPD has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 90.42%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
