Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MLPDvsMLPIETF Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. MLPD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.68% for MLPI. MLPD is up 4.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. MLPI performs better with 13.8% YTD performance, and +$313M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MLPD and MLPI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MLPD vs MLPI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MLPD MLPI | +0.97%+4.42% | +6.10%n/a | +4.63%+13.80% | +20.71%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MLPD MLPI | +$4M+$172M | +$7M- | +$6M+$313M | +$10M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MLPD MLPI | +10.22%n/a | +14.66%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MLPD MLPI | -1.68%n/a | -12.85%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MLPD MLPI | 8dn/a | 61dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MLPD | MLPI | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.73 | |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $25.67 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MLPD | MLPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MLPD | MLPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.73 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.22% | – |
| AuM | $20.18 M | $356.94 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.68% |
MLPD | MLPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 22 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 7, 2024 | December 18, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MLPD and MLPI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, MLPD is up 4.63% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPI has returned 13.8%. That puts MLPI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MLPD or MLPI?
Year-to-date, the MLPD ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$313M for MLPI.
Which ETF is bigger: MLPD or MLPI?
As of March 10, 2026, MLPD holds $20.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPI manages $356.94 M.
What sectors do the MLPD and MLPI ETFs invest in?
MLPD leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, MLPI focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MLPD ETF and MLPI ETF?
MLPD top holdings include WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE. MLPI holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, ENBRIDGE and TC ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: MLPD or MLPI?
MLPD holds 26 securities with 90.42% of its assets in the top 15. MLPI has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 82.72%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
