Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MIDvsQMOMETF Comparison
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. MID's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, QMOM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. MID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.29% for QMOM. MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. QMOM performs better with 4.37% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MID and QMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MID vs QMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MID QMOM | -4.84%-2.02% | -6.93%+3.61% | -2.94%+4.37% | +12.45%+19.89% | +45.12%+61.41% | +22.48%+31.42% |
| Flows | MID QMOM | -$57K+$2M | +$3M+$7M | -$5M+$6M | +$7M+$19M | +$34M+$150M | +$62M+$182M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MID QMOM | +18.62%+25.60% | +23.47%+24.79% | +19.94%+21.78% | +23.98%+24.65% |
| Max drawdown | MID QMOM | -7.41%-8.04% | -16.53%-14.73% | -23.84%-26.41% | -40.04%-26.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | MID QMOM | 43d10d | 38d50d | 154d414d | 1060d414d |
MID | QMOM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.74 | $66.97 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.97 | $68.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MID | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.74 | $66.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -1.73% |
| AuM | $88.77 M | $361.67 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.29% |
MID | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 47 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 15, 2020 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MID and QMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD), while QMOM has returned 4.37%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MID or QMOM?
Year-to-date, the MID ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to +$6M for QMOM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MID or QMOM?
Over the past year, MID had a volatility of 23.47%, while QMOM experienced 24.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: MID or QMOM?
As of March 11, 2026, MID holds $88.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMOM manages $361.67 M.
What sectors do the MID and QMOM ETFs invest in?
MID leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QMOM focuses on Industrials, Materials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MID ETF and QMOM ETF?
MID top holdings include CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS. QMOM holds in its top three: ENERGY FUELS, COEUR MINING INC and GB00BRXH2664.
Which ETF is more diversified: MID or QMOM?
MID holds 36 securities with 56.76% of its assets in the top 15. QMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.45%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
