Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MIDvsPFUTETF Comparison
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. MID's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PFUT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. MID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.65% for PFUT. MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. PFUT performs worse with -6.28% YTD performance, and -$386M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MID and PFUT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MID vs PFUT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MID PFUT | -4.84%-2.74% | -6.93%-7.84% | -2.94%-6.28% | +12.45%+5.97% | +45.12%+39.20% | +22.48%n/a |
| Flows | MID PFUT | -$57K-$409M | +$3M-$380M | -$5M-$386M | +$7M-$329M | +$34M-$222M | +$62M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MID PFUT | +18.62%+16.93% | +23.47%+22.18% | +19.94%+18.51% | +23.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MID PFUT | -7.41%-9.09% | -16.53%-16.31% | -23.84%-27.52% | -40.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MID PFUT | 43d65d | 38d45d | 154d463d | 1060dn/a |
MID | PFUT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.74 | $23.56 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.97 | $23.82 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MID | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.74 | $23.56 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -1.08% |
| AuM | $88.77 M | $4.75 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.65% |
MID | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Putnam |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 62 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 15, 2020 | May 25, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MID and PFUT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD), while PFUT has lost -6.28%. That puts MID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MID or PFUT?
Year-to-date, the MID ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to -$386M for PFUT.
Which ETF is more volatile: MID or PFUT?
Over the past year, MID had a volatility of 23.47%, while PFUT experienced 22.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: MID or PFUT?
As of March 11, 2026, MID holds $88.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while PFUT manages $4.75 M.
What sectors do the MID and PFUT ETFs invest in?
MID leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PFUT focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the MID ETF and PFUT ETF?
MID top holdings include CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS. PFUT holds in its top three: VERTIV HOLDINGS, HILTON INC and PENUMBRA.
Which ETF is more diversified: MID or PFUT?
MID holds 36 securities with 56.76% of its assets in the top 15. PFUT has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.36%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
