Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MIDvsJMIDETF Comparison
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. MID's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, JMID's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. MID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.3% for JMID. MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. JMID performs better with -0.42% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MID and JMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MID vs JMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MID JMID | -4.84%-3.42% | -6.93%-3.14% | -2.94%-0.42% | +12.45%+14.73% | +45.12%n/a | +22.48%n/a |
| Flows | MID JMID | -$57K+$756K | +$3M-$2M | -$5M-$3M | +$7M-$4M | +$34M- | +$62M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MID JMID | +18.62%+16.69% | +23.47%+22.74% | +19.94%n/a | +23.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MID JMID | -7.41%-5.08% | -16.53%-16.29% | -23.84%n/a | -40.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MID JMID | 43d55d | 38d46d | 154dn/a | 1060dn/a |
MID | JMID | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.97 | $28.13 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $63.10 | $28.28 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MID | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.97 | $28.13 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $88.77 M | $17.36 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.3% |
MID | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 82 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 15, 2020 | September 17, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MID and JMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD), while JMID has lost -0.42%. That puts JMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MID or JMID?
Year-to-date, the MID ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to -$3M for JMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: MID or JMID?
Over the past year, MID had a volatility of 23.47%, while JMID experienced 22.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: MID or JMID?
As of March 11, 2026, MID holds $88.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while JMID manages $17.36 M.
What sectors do the MID and JMID ETFs invest in?
MID leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, JMID focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MID ETF and JMID ETF?
MID top holdings include CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS. JMID holds in its top three: AMERISOURCEBERGEN, VERTIV HOLDINGS and AMERIPRISE FINANCE.
Which ETF is more diversified: MID or JMID?
MID holds 36 securities with 56.76% of its assets in the top 15. JMID has 83 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.53%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
