Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MIDvsIMCGETF Comparison
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. MID's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IMCG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. MID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.06% for IMCG. MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. IMCG performs better with -0.6% YTD performance, and +$42M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MID and IMCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MID vs IMCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MID IMCG | -4.84%-2.63% | -6.93%-1.64% | -2.94%-0.60% | +12.45%+12.49% | +45.12%+48.62% | +22.48%+30.76% |
| Flows | MID IMCG | -$57K+$4M | +$3M+$46M | -$5M+$42M | +$7M+$428M | +$34M+$1.10B | +$62M+$1.05B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MID IMCG | +18.62%+16.86% | +23.47%+20.38% | +19.94%+17.05% | +23.98%+20.13% |
| Max drawdown | MID IMCG | -7.41%-6.28% | -16.53%-14.57% | -23.84%-21.86% | -40.04%-35.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | MID IMCG | 43d14d | 38d43d | 154d206d | 1060d1060d |
MID | IMCG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.74 | $79.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.97 | $79.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MID | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MID | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.74 | $79.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $88.77 M | $3.11 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.06% |
MID | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 245 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 15, 2020 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MID and IMCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCG has lost -0.6%. That puts IMCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MID or IMCG?
Year-to-date, the MID ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to +$42M for IMCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: MID or IMCG?
Over the past year, MID had a volatility of 23.47%, while IMCG experienced 20.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: MID or IMCG?
As of March 11, 2026, MID holds $88.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCG manages $3.11 B.
What sectors do the MID and IMCG ETFs invest in?
MID leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IMCG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MID ETF and IMCG ETF?
MID top holdings include CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS. IMCG holds in its top three: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: MID or IMCG?
MID holds 36 securities with 56.76% of its assets in the top 15. IMCG has 269 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
