Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MIDvsGLRYETF Comparison
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. MID's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. MID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.96% for GLRY. MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 6.86% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MID and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MID vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MID GLRY | -4.84%-2.51% | -6.93%+2.47% | -2.94%+6.86% | +12.45%+34.21% | +45.12%+67.81% | +22.48%+32.87% |
| Flows | MID GLRY | -$57K+$3M | +$3M+$20M | -$5M+$19M | +$7M+$47M | +$34M+$57M | +$62M+$76M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MID GLRY | +18.62%+21.98% | +23.47%+21.32% | +19.94%+17.52% | +23.98%+20.32% |
| Max drawdown | MID GLRY | -7.41%-6.18% | -16.53%-12.46% | -23.84%-20.66% | -40.04%-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | MID GLRY | 43d14d | 38d37d | 154d209d | 1060d917d |
MID | GLRY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.74 | $37.45 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.97 | $37.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MID | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.74 | $37.45 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.53% |
| AuM | $88.77 M | $143.98 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.96% |
MID | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 32 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 15, 2020 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MID and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MID is down -2.94% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 6.86%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MID or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the MID ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to +$19M for GLRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: MID or GLRY?
Over the past year, MID had a volatility of 23.47%, while GLRY experienced 21.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: MID or GLRY?
As of March 11, 2026, MID holds $88.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $143.98 M.
What sectors do the MID and GLRY ETFs invest in?
MID leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MID ETF and GLRY ETF?
MID top holdings include CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS. GLRY holds in its top three: AMPHENOL, KLA CORPORATION and CURTISS WRIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: MID or GLRY?
MID holds 36 securities with 56.76% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 32 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
