MGMTvsJHSCETF Comparison
VS
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MGMT's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, JHSC's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. MGMT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.15%, versus 0.46% for JHSC. MGMT is up 12.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. JHSC performs better with 13.42% YTD performance, and -$25M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGMT and JHSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MGMT vs JHSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGMT JHSC | +3.07%+4.38% | -1.07%-2.08% | +12.89%+13.42% | +18.20%+15.69% | +57.66%+63.19% | +37.08%+34.89% |
| Flows | MGMT JHSC | -$1M-$15M | -$5M-$13M | -$5M-$25M | -$7M+$2M | -$2M+$149M | +$78M+$91M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGMT JHSC | +12.06%+11.68% | +15.06%+14.69% | +18.67%+18.50% | +19.50%+19.96% |
| Max drawdown | MGMT JHSC | -7.47%-9.09% | -12.25%-9.51% | -23.93%-25.36% | -25.20%-25.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | MGMT JHSC | 75d75d | 114d53d | 262d379d | 870d379d |
Trading data
MGMT | JHSC | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $50.33 | $47.85 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $49.96 | $47.31 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGMT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMGMT | JHSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
MGMT | JHSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.33 | $47.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.74% | +1.14% |
| AuM | $167.57 M | $696.19 M |
| E/R | 1.15% | 0.46% |
Characteristics
MGMT | JHSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Ballast Asset Management | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 53 | 486 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2020 | August 11, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MGMT
USA
92.84%
Other
7.16%
JHSC
USA
96.89%
Other
3.11%
Sectors
MGMT
Finance
17.96%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.32%
Technology
16.25%
Energy
14.02%
Industrials
9.31%
Healthcare
8.74%
Other
17.4%
JHSC
Finance
26.79%
Industrials
14.79%
Technology
9.64%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.07%
Energy
7.98%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.68%
Other
24.05%
Advertisement
Diversification
MGMT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.58%
JHSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
MGMT
Natural Resource Partners LP
4.75%
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
4.52%
Capital Bancorp, Inc. (Maryland)
3.21%
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp.
3.13%
AZZ, Inc.
3.02%
Cavco Industries, Inc.
2.83%
Merchants Bancorp (Indiana)
2.65%
Kosmos Energy Ltd.
2.49%
Paysign, Inc.
2.36%
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
2.34%
Landstar System, Inc.
2.30%
Bruker Corp.
2.27%
The GEO Group, Inc.
2.24%
Ecovyst, Inc.
2.23%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
2.23%
JHSC
Ryder System, Inc.
0.49%
Avnet, Inc.
0.48%
Voya Financial, Inc.
0.47%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
0.46%
SM Energy Co.
0.46%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.46%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.46%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.45%
The Timken Co.
0.43%
UGI Corp.
0.43%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
0.42%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
0.42%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
0.41%
NOV, Inc.
0.41%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
0.40%
Frequently asked questions about MGMT and JHSC
How have the MGMT and JHSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, MGMT is up 12.89% year-to-date (YTD), while JHSC has returned 13.42%. That puts JHSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGMT or JHSC?
Year-to-date, the MGMT ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to -$25M for JHSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: MGMT or JHSC?
Over the past year, MGMT had a volatility of 15.06%, while JHSC experienced 14.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: MGMT or JHSC?
As of October 30, 2026, MGMT holds $167.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHSC manages $696.19 M.
What sectors do the MGMT and JHSC ETFs invest in?
MGMT leans toward sectors like Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, JHSC focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MGMT ETF and JHSC ETF?
MGMT top holdings include Natural Resource Partners LP, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. and Capital Bancorp, Inc. (Maryland). JHSC holds in its top three: Ryder System, Inc., Avnet, Inc. and Voya Financial, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MGMT or JHSC?
MGMT holds 53 securities with 42.58% of its assets in the top 15. JHSC has 490 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.66%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
