MGMTvsACSVETF Comparison
VS
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is part of the US Small Cap Value segment. MGMT's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, ACSV's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. MGMT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.15%, versus 0.49% for ACSV. MGMT is up 11.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. ACSV performs better with 18.91% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGMT and ACSV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MGMT vs ACSV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGMT ACSV | -4.93%-5.57% | +0.40%+1.27% | +11.94%+18.91% | +13.16%n/a | +46.00%n/a | +41.43%n/a |
| Flows | MGMT ACSV | -+$3M | -$6M+$7M | -$3M+$15M | -$10M- | +$6M- | +$81M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGMT ACSV | +11.54%+12.16% | +15.72%n/a | +18.77%n/a | +19.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MGMT ACSV | -5.37%-6.00% | -12.25%n/a | -23.93%n/a | -25.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MGMT ACSV | 32d32d | 114dn/a | 262dn/a | 870dn/a |
Trading data
MGMT | ACSV | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.34 | $47.81 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $49.60 | $48.14 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MGMT | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.34 | $47.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.53% | -0.68% |
| AuM | $168.64 M | $22.83 M |
| E/R | 1.15% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
MGMT | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Ballast Asset Management | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 55 | 200 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2020 | October 14, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MGMT
USA
93.46%
Other
6.54%
ACSV
USA
94.1%
Other
5.9%
Sectors
MGMT
Finance
18.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
17.7%
Technology
15.85%
Energy
12.32%
Industrials
10.03%
Healthcare
9.26%
Other
16.61%
ACSV
Finance
41.63%
Technology
9.99%
Industrials
9.81%
Energy
9.17%
Other
29.4%
Diversification
MGMT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.48%
ACSV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.01%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MGMT
Natural Resource Partners LP
4.10%
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
3.61%
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp.
3.29%
AZZ, Inc.
3.11%
Capital Bancorp, Inc. (Maryland)
2.92%
Merchants Bancorp (Indiana)
2.86%
Cavco Industries, Inc.
2.65%
Ecovyst, Inc.
2.62%
Kosmos Energy Ltd.
2.53%
The GEO Group, Inc.
2.41%
The Brink's Co.
2.37%
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
2.34%
Landstar System, Inc.
2.28%
Metallus, Inc.
2.24%
Criteo SA
2.18%
ACSV
Old National Bancorp
2.01%
Provident Financial Services, Inc.
1.99%
Enovis Corp.
1.92%
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp.
1.78%
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
1.75%
United Bankshares, Inc. (West Virginia)
1.70%
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
1.67%
Terreno Realty Corp.
1.63%
Chord Energy Corp.
1.61%
Central Bancompany, Inc.
1.41%
Edgewell Personal Care Co.
1.40%
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
1.34%
Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.
1.31%
EVERTEC, Inc.
1.26%
TriNet Group, Inc.
1.23%
Frequently asked questions about MGMT and ACSV
How have the MGMT and ACSV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, MGMT is up 11.94% year-to-date (YTD), while ACSV has returned 18.91%. That puts ACSV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGMT or ACSV?
Year-to-date, the MGMT ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$15M for ACSV.
Which ETF is bigger: MGMT or ACSV?
As of September 17, 2026, MGMT holds $168.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACSV manages $22.83 M.
What sectors do the MGMT and ACSV ETFs invest in?
MGMT leans toward sectors like Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, ACSV focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MGMT ETF and ACSV ETF?
MGMT top holdings include Natural Resource Partners LP, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp.. ACSV holds in its top three: Old National Bancorp, Provident Financial Services, Inc. and Enovis Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MGMT or ACSV?
MGMT holds 55 securities with 41.48% of its assets in the top 15. ACSV has 200 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.01%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
