MGCvsTSPAETF Comparison
VS
Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF (TSPA) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. MGC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, TSPA's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. MGC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.05%, versus 0.34% for TSPA. MGC is up 14.07% year-to-date (YTD) with -$668M in YTD flows. TSPA performs worse with 13.33% YTD performance, and +$2.18B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGC and TSPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MGC vs TSPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGC TSPA | +0.35%-0.05% | +5.58%+3.87% | +14.07%+13.33% | +13.39%+12.94% | +98.12%+94.31% | +85.94%+81.53% |
| Flows | MGC TSPA | +$15M+$116M | -$42M+$333M | -$668M+$2.18B | +$227M+$2.22B | +$2.02B+$3.88B | +$2.09B+$3.89B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGC TSPA | +11.92%+11.64% | +13.39%+13.17% | +15.45%+15.21% | +17.49%+17.69% |
| Max drawdown | MGC TSPA | -3.02%-3.21% | -9.86%-9.19% | -19.36%-19.15% | -25.79%-24.81% |
| Max drawdown duration | MGC TSPA | 22d21d | 92d75d | 126d127d | 707d704d |
Trading data
MGC | TSPA | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $282.45 | $48.49 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $284.29 | $48.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TSPA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMGC | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MGC | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $282.45 | $48.49 |
| 1D performance | -0.65% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $10.36 B | $4.67 B |
| E/R | 0.05% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
MGC | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Vanguard | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Mega Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 170 | 325 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 17, 2007 | June 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MGC
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
TSPA
USA
95.85%
Other
4.15%
Sectors
MGC
Technology
51.31%
Finance
12.2%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.41%
Healthcare
9.19%
Other
17.9%
TSPA
Technology
45.47%
Finance
13.88%
Healthcare
9.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.98%
Industrials
7.46%
Other
15.13%
Advertisement
Diversification
MGC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.2%
TSPA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MGC
NVIDIA Corp.
9.33%
Apple, Inc.
8.55%
Microsoft Corp.
6.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.66%
Broadcom Inc.
3.22%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.31%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.99%
Tesla, Inc.
1.91%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.80%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.61%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.41%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.23%
TSPA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.04%
Apple, Inc.
6.79%
Microsoft Corp.
5.82%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.02%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.21%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.09%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.45%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.41%
Tesla, Inc.
1.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.27%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.15%
Johnson & Johnson
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about MGC and TSPA
How have the MGC and TSPA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, MGC is up 14.07% year-to-date (YTD), while TSPA has returned 13.33%. That puts MGC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGC or TSPA?
Year-to-date, the MGC ETF saw -$668M in flows, compared to +$2.18B for TSPA.
Which ETF is more volatile: MGC or TSPA?
Over the past year, MGC had a volatility of 13.39%, while TSPA experienced 13.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: MGC or TSPA?
As of October 28, 2026, MGC holds $10.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while TSPA manages $4.67 B.
What sectors do the MGC and TSPA ETFs invest in?
MGC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, TSPA focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the MGC ETF and TSPA ETF?
MGC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. TSPA holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MGC or TSPA?
MGC holds 172 securities with 53.2% of its assets in the top 15. TSPA has 326 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.35%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
